Non-Artificial Intelligence

(טו) הַכּוֹתֵב סֵפֶר תּוֹרָה אוֹ תְּפִלִּין אוֹ מְזוּזָה וּבִשְׁעַת כְּתִיבָה לֹא הָיְתָה לוֹ כַּוָּנָה וְכָתַב אַזְכָּרָה מִן הָאַזְכָּרוֹת שֶׁבָּהֶן שֶׁלֹּא לִשְׁמָן פְּסוּלִין. לְפִיכָךְ הַכּוֹתֵב אֶת הַשֵּׁם אֲפִלּוּ מֶלֶךְ יִשְׂרָאֵל שׁוֹאֵל בִּשְׁלוֹמוֹ לֹא יְשִׁיבֶנּוּ. הָיָה כּוֹתֵב שְׁנַיִם אוֹ שְׁלֹשָׁה שֵׁמוֹת הֲרֵי זֶה מַפְסִיק בֵּינֵיהֶם וּמֵשִׁיב:

(15) If one who writes a scroll of the Law, phylacteries or a Mezuzah, had not concentrated his mind while writing, and wrote one of the Names of God without express intent, these articles are unfit for use. Accordingly, when one is writing the name of God, even if an Israelite king greets him, he must not return the greeting. If he is writing two or three names of God, he may pause between writing one and writing the others and may respond.

(א) נִמְצֵאתָ לָמֵד שֶׁעֶשְׂרים דְּבָרִים הֵן שֶׁבְּכָל אֶחָד מֵהֶן פּוֹסֵל סֵפֶר תּוֹרָה. וְאִם נַעֲשָׂה בּוֹ אֶחָד מֵהֶן הֲרֵי הוּא כְּחֻמָּשׁ מִן הַחֻמָּשִׁין שֶׁמְּלַמְּדִין בָּהֶן הַתִּינוֹקוֹת וְאֵין בּוֹ קְדֻשַּׁת סֵפֶר תּוֹרָה וְאֵין קוֹרִין בּוֹ בָּרַבִּים. וְאֵלּוּ הֵן. א. אִם נִכְתַּב עַל עוֹר בְּהֵמָה טְמֵאָה. ב. שֶׁנִּכְתַּב עַל עוֹר בְּהֵמָה טְהוֹרָה שֶׁאֵינוֹ מְעֻבָּד. ג. שֶׁהָיָה מְעֻבָּד שֶׁלֹּא לְשֵׁם סֵפֶר תּוֹרָה. ד. שֶׁנִּכְתַּב שֶׁלֹּא בִּמְקוֹם כְּתִיבָה עַל הַגְּוִיל בִּמְקוֹם בָּשָׂר וְעַל הַקְּלָף בִּמְקוֹם שֵׂעָר. ה. שֶׁנִּכְתַּב מִקְצָתוֹ עַל הַגְּוִיל וּמִקְצָתוֹ עַל הַקְּלָף. ו. שֶׁנִּכְתַּב עַל דּוּכְסוּסְטוּס. ז. שֶׁנִּכְתַּב בְּלֹא שִׂרְטוּט. ח. שֶׁנִּכְתַּב בְּלֹא שָׁחוֹר הָעוֹמֵד. ט. שֶׁנִּכְתַּב בִּשְׁאָר לְשׁוֹנוֹת. י. שֶׁכְּתָבוֹ אֶפִּיקוֹרוֹס אוֹ כַּיּוֹצֵא בּוֹ מִשְּׁאָר פְּסוּלִין. יא. שֶׁכָּתַב הָאַזְכָּרוֹת בְּלֹא כַּוָּנָה. יב. שֶׁחִסֵּר אֲפִלּוּ אוֹת אַחַת. יג. שֶׁהוֹסִיף אֲפִלּוּ אוֹת אַחַת. יד. שֶׁנָּגְעָה אוֹת בְּאוֹת. טו. שֶׁנִּפְסְדָה צוּרַת אוֹת אַחַת עַד שֶׁלֹּא תִּקָּרֵא כָּל עִקָּר אוֹ תִּדְמֶה לְאוֹת אַחֶרֶת. בֵּין בְּעִקַּר הַכְּתִיבָה בֵּין בְּנֶקֶב בֵּין בְּקֶרַע בֵּין בְּטִשְׁטוּשׁ. טז. שֶׁהִרְחִיק אוֹ שֶׁהִקְרִיב בֵּין אוֹת לְאוֹת עַד שֶׁתֵּרָאֶה הַתֵּבָה כִּשְׁתֵּי תֵּבוֹת אוֹ שְׁתֵּי תֵּבוֹת כְּתֵבָה אַחַת. יז. שֶׁשִּׁנָּה צוּרַת הַפָּרָשִׁיּוֹת. יח. שֶׁשִּׁנָּה צוּרַת הַשִּׁירוֹת. יט. שֶׁכָּתַב בִּשְׁאָר הַכְּתָב כְּשִׁירָה. כ. שֶׁתָּפַר הַיְרִיעוֹת בְּלֹא גִּידֵי טְהוֹרָה. וּשְׁאָר הַדְּבָרִים לְמִצְוָה לֹא לְעַכֵּב:

(1) You thus find that there are twenty factors, any one of which disqualifies a scroll of the law. If any of these occurs, the scroll is like one of the books of the Pentateuch out of which children are taught. It does not possess the sanctity of a scroll of the Law, and is not used for reading in public worship. They are as follows:
1) If it was written on the skin of a beast of an unclean species;
2) or on the skin of a beast of a clean species, which had not been tanned;
3) If the skin had been tanned but not for the express purpose of being used as a scroll of the law;
4) If it was written on the wrong side; in the case of parchment of whole hide on the side next to the flesh; in the case of parchment of the outer half of a split hide, on the side adjacent to the hair;
5) If it was written partly on parchment of whole hide and partly on that made of the outer half of split hide;
6) If it was written on the inner half of a split hide;
7) If it was written without the lines having been previously ruled;
8) If it was written with a dark writing fluid that does not make a permanent impression;
9) If it was written in other languages;
10) If it was written by a heretic (Epikouros) or other disqualified persons;
11) If the scribe wrote the names of God without special concentration of mind;
12) If a single letter was omitted;
13) If a single letter was added;
14) If one letter touched another;
15) If a single letter was so marred that it cannot be read at all, or resembles another letter, whether the defect is in the writing, or is due to a perforation, rent or smudge;
16) If the scribe wrote letters so far apart or so closely together that one word looks like two words or two words look like one word;
17) If he altered the form of the sections*Wrote an “open” section as if it were a “closed” section or vice versa.;
18) If he varied the form of writing the Songs;
19) If he wrote any other portion in the form of a Song;
20) If he did not sew the sheets with sinews of a beast of a clean species.
The other conditions stated are recommended as the best way of performing the duty of writing a scroll. Their non-observance does not render it unfit for use.

גמ׳ אמר ליה רב בודיא לרב אשי יתר על כדי דמיהן הוא דאין לוקחין הא בכדי דמיהן לוקחין שמע מינה ס"ת שנמצא ביד עובד כוכבים קורין בו דילמא לגנוז אמר רב נחמן נקטינן ספר תורה שכתבו מין ישרף כתבו עובד כוכבים יגנז נמצא ביד מין יגנז נמצא ביד עובד כוכבים אמרי לה יגנז ואמרי לה קורין בו ספר תורה שכתבו עובד כוכבים תני חדא ישרף ותניא אידך יגנז ותניא אידך קורין בו לא קשיא הא דתניא ישרף ר"א היא דאמר סתם מחשבת עובד כוכבים לעבודת כוכבים והא דתניא יגנז האי תנא הוא דתני רב המנונא בריה דרבא מפשרוניא ס"ת תפלין ומזוזות שכתבן (מין) ומסור עובד כוכבים ועבד אשה וקטן וכותי וישראל מומר פסולין שנאמר (דברים יא, יח) וקשרתם וכתבתם כל שישנו בקשירה ישנו בכתיבה וכל שאינו בקשירה אינו בכתיבה והא דתניא קורין בו האי תנא הוא דתניא לוקחין ספרים מן העובדי כוכבים בכל מקום ובלבד שיהיו כתובין כהלכתן ומעשה בעובד כוכבים אחד בצידן שהיה כותב ספרים והתיר רשב"ג ליקח ממנו ורשב"ג עיבוד לשמן בעי כתיבה לשמן לא בעי דתניא ציפן זהב או שטלה עליהן עור בהמה טמאה פסולות עור בהמה טהורה כשרות ואע"פ שלא עיבדן לשמן רבי שמעון בן גמליאל אומר אפילו עור בהמה טהורה פסולות עד שיעבדן לשמן אמר רבה בר שמואל בגר שחזר לסורו לסורו כ"ש דהוי ליה מין אמר רב אשי שחוזר לסורו משום יראה תנו רבנן מעלין בדמיהן עד כדי טרפעיק מאי טרפעיק אמר רב ששת איסתירא ההיא טייעתא דאייתי חייתא דתפילי לקמיה דאביי אמר לה יהבת לי ריש ריש בתמרי אימליא זיהרא שקלא שדתינהו בנהרא אמר לא אבעי לי לזלזולינהו באפה כולי האי:
GEMARA: Rav Budya said to Rav Ashi that one could infer the following from the mishna: It is for more than their actual monetary value that one may not purchase them; however, for their precise value, one may purchase them. Can one learn from the mishna that with regard to a Torah scroll that is found in the possession of a gentile, one can read from it after obtaining it from the gentile, and there is no concern that perhaps the gentile wrote it and it is unfit? Rav Ashi answered: Perhaps this does not mean that the Torah scroll is purchased in order to read from it, but rather in order to inter it and not to use it; however, it is nevertheless purchased so that it will not be desecrated by the gentiles. Rav Naḥman says: We have a tradition that a Torah scroll that was written by a heretic should be burned; a Torah scroll written by a gentile should be interred; a Torah scroll found in the possession of a heretic, and it is not clear who wrote it, should be interred. With regard to a Torah scroll found in the possession of a gentile, some say it should be interred and some say that one may read from it. The Gemara asks: With regard to a Torah scroll that was written by a gentile, it is taught in one baraita: It should be burned, and it is taught in another baraita: It should be interred, and it is taught in another baraita: One may read from it. There is a three-fold contradiction concerning the halakha of a Torah scroll written by a gentile. The Gemara explains: This is not difficult: That which is taught in a baraita, that it should be burned, is the opinion of Rabbi Eliezer, who says: The unspecified intentions of a gentile are for idol worship, and therefore everything he wrote is assumed to be written for the sake of idolatrous worship and must be burned. And that which is taught in a baraita, which said that it should be interred, is the opinion of this tanna, as Rav Hamnuna, son of Rava of Pashronya, taught: A Torah scroll, phylacteries, or mezuzot that were written by a heretic or an informer, a gentile or a slave, a woman or a minor, or a Samaritan or a Jewish apostate, are unfit, as it is stated: “And you shall bind them as a sign on your hand…and you shall write them on the doorposts of your house” (Deuteronomy 6:8–9). From this juxtaposition, one can derive the following: Anyone who is included in the mitzva of binding the phylacteries, i.e., one who is both obligated and performs the mitzva, is included in the class of people who may write Torah scrolls, phylacteries, and mezuzot; but anyone who is not included in the mitzva of binding is not included in the class of people who may write sacred texts. This baraita equates the halakha of a Torah scroll written by a gentile to the halakha of Torah scrolls written by these other types of people, which are interred. And concerning that which is taught in a baraita, i.e., that one may read from it, that baraita is in accordance with the opinion of this following tanna, as it is taught in a baraita (Tosefta, Avoda Zara 3:6): One may purchase Torah scrolls from gentiles in any location, provided that they are written in accordance with their halakhot. And there was an incident involving a gentile in Tzaidan who would write Torah scrolls, and Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel permitted the Jews to purchase the Torah scrolls from him. The Gemara asks: And does Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel require that the preparation of the parchment of Torah scrolls, phylacteries, and mezuzot be for their sake, i.e., for the sake of their use in a mitzva, but he does not require that the writing be for their sake? The Gemara quotes the source that Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel requires that the parchment be prepared for their sake: As it is taught in a baraita: If one took phylacteries and coated them with gold or patched them with the skin of a non-kosher animal, then they are unfit. However, if one patched them with the skin of a kosher animal, then they are fit, and this is so even though he did not prepare them, i.e., the skin, for their sake, i.e., for the sake of their use in a mitzva. Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says: Even if he patched them with the skin of a kosher animal they are unfit, until he prepares them for their sake. Being that he holds that the parchment needs to be prepared for their sake, their actual writing should certainly be done for their sake. Rabba bar Shmuel says: That incident in Tzaidan involved a convert who returned to his previous corrupt ways [suro] by reverting to living like a gentile. He nevertheless remains a Jew. The Gemara asks: If he returned to his previous corrupt ways all the more so should the Torah scroll be rendered unfit, as he is a heretic. Once he learns the Jewish faith and abandons it, he is considered a heretic. Rav Ashi says: This means that he returned to his previous corrupt ways due to fear, and not because he rejected the Jewish faith. He ceased acting like a Jew out of fear of reprisal. Since he is a Jew, it is permitted for him to read from the Torah scrolls that he writes. § The Gemara clarifies the halakha from the mishna that one may not purchase sacred items from a gentile for more than their actual value. The Sages taught: One may increase payment beyond their value up to a terapa’ik. The Gemara asks: What is a terapa’ik? Rav Sheshet said: It is an istera, worth one half of a dinar. The Gemara relates: There was a certain Arab merchant woman [taya’ata] who brought a sack [ḥayeta] of phylacteries in front of Abaye. He said to her: Would you give me each pair for a date? She became full of anger, and took the phylacteries and threw them into the river because Abaye offered her such a small amount in exchange for them. Abaye said in remorse: I should not have denigrated the phylacteries so much in her presence, but rather, I should have offered to pay her their actual value.