Chazal: The Focus on Individual Suffering
- The Rabbinic Reformulation
- In Biblical times, as we have seen in many texts, the focus is really on the community. In rabbinic Judaism, the individual and their needs become more focused. There are exceptions, like the books of Ecclesiastes and Job, but these are relatively late works. The voices of suffering is also given voices in books like Psalms and Lamentations.
- However, in rabbinic Judaism there is more focus on the individual and the existential challenges of living in light of suffering.
- How do the rabbis grapple with the reality of Zaddik ve-Ra Lo/ the righteous who suffer? This question takes on both a metaphysical significance (how do we understand the actions of God) as well as an anthropocentric focus (how do we related to the reality of suffering.)
- In struggling with this notion, most rabbinic formulations will maintain the foundations that we spoke about in lecture one- God is Beneficent, God is Omniscient, and God is Omnipotent.
- Everything that is done is done for the Good- the search for meaning
- Metaphysical formulations
ii.TEXT 2- B.T. Berakhot 60b - What are the inherent lessons in this story
- Existential Formultions
ii.TEXT 4- Elisha ben Avuyah- fails to find meaning in the suffering and becomes a heretic
- Zaddik ve-ra Lo - Various formulations
- Completely Righteous or partially righteous- TEXT 5 –Berakhot 7a / Response to the skeptic: You do not know the calculus of judgement.
- Judgement is not only this world but Olam Haba – TEXT 6- Bereishit Rabba 33:1
- Even Innocent suffering can be a merit –TEXT 7 Beakhot 5a
- However, we need to again look at our question above. Are these metaphysical statements or existential statements. Do they teach us about God, or about how we are to look at events
- Jonathan Sacks- the aggadah versus the halakha of suffering
A man is in duty bound to utter a benediction for the bad even as he utters one for the good ; as it is said, "And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might" (Deut. vi. 5) — "with all thy heart," i.e. with thy two impulses, with the good and the evil impulse ; "with all thy soul," i.e. even if He take thy soul; "with all thy might," i.e. with all thy wealth. Another explanation of "with all thy might [meodeka]" — with whatever measure [middah] He metes out to thee, do Thou return Him thanks [modeh].
בתלמידי רבינו יונה ז"ל. בכל לבבך בשני יצריך ביצר טוב וביצר רע - עבודת יצר הטוב היא עשיית המצות ועבודת יצר הרע הוא שיכבוש יצרו המתגבר עליו וזו היא העבודה שלו מה שאדם יכול לעבוד לבוראו ביצר הרע. עוד נוכל לומר שיצר הטוב הוא מדת הרחמנות וכיוצא בזה ויצר הרע נברא לאכזריות. וכשאדם אינו מרחם על הרשעים והוא אכזרי להם נמצא שהוא עושה מצוה גדולה ועבודת השם עם יצר הרע. מפי מורי הרב נר"ו. עד כאן לשון תלמידי רבינו יונה:
The students of Rabbeinu Yonah- With all thy hear. with your two inclinations- the good and evil inclinations. The good inclination is the performance of the commandments and the evil inclination denotes the struggle to vanquish the lower inclinations. This is what it means 'to serve God with the evil inclination.
על בשורות טובות אומר הטוב והמטיב על בשורות רעות אומר ברוך דיין האמת
For good tidings he says "Who is good and who bestows good" and For bad tidings he says "Blessed be the true Judge"!
לעולם יהא אדם רגיל לומר כל דעביד רחמנא לטב עביד כי הא דרבי עקיבא דהוה קאזיל באורחא מטא לההיא מתא בעא אושפיזא לא יהבי ליה אמר כל דעביד רחמנא לטב אזל ובת בדברא והוה בהדיה תרנגולא וחמרא ושרגא אתא זיקא כבייה לשרגא אתא שונרא אכליה לתרנגולא אתא אריה אכליה לחמרא אמר כל דעביד רחמנא לטב ביה בליליא אתא גייסא שבייה למתא אמר להו לאו אמרי לכו כל מה שעושה הקדוש ברוך הוא הכל לטובה:
A man should always accustom himself to say, "Whatever the All-merciful does, He does for the best." As when R.'Akiba was journeying by the way, he came to a certain town and asked for hospitality, but it was refused him ; so he exclaimed, "Whatever the All - merciful does is for the best." He went and spent the night in the field, having with him a cock, an ass and a lamp. A gust of wind came and extinguished the lamp, a cat came and ate the cock, and a lion came and devoured the ass ; but he exclaimed, "Whatever the All-merciful does is for the best." That same night a band of robbers came and captured the town. He thereupon said to them, "Did I not tell you that whatever the Holy One, blessed be He, does isall for the best!"
(ב) אֵלִ֣י אֵ֭לִי לָמָ֣ה עֲזַבְתָּ֑נִי רָח֥וֹק מִֽ֝ישׁוּעָתִ֗י דִּבְרֵ֥י שַׁאֲגָתִֽי׃
Don't read למה – why? – rather read ל–מה – for what?
שלשה דברים בקש משה מלפני הקב"ה ונתן לו בקש שתשרה שכינה על ישראל ונתן לו שנאמר (שמות לג, טז) הלוא בלכתך עמנו בקש שלא תשרה שכינה על עובדי כוכבים ונתן לו שנאמר (שמות לג, טז) ונפלינו אני ועמך בקש להודיעו דרכיו של הקב"ה ונתן לו שנא' (שמות לג, יג) הודיעני נא את דרכיך אמר לפניו רבש"ע מפני מה יש צדיק וטוב לו ויש צדיק ורע לו יש רשע וטוב לו ויש רשע ורע לו אמר לו משה צדיק וטוב לו צדיק בן צדיק צדיק ורע לו צדיק בן רשע רשע וטוב לו רשע בן צדיק רשע ורע לו רשע בן רשע: אמר מר צדיק וטוב לו צדיק בן צדיק צדיק ורע לו צדיק בן רשע איני והא כתיב (שמות לד, ז) פקד עון אבות על בנים וכתיב (דברים כד, טז) ובנים לא יומתו על אבות ורמינן קראי אהדדי ומשנינן לא קשיא הא כשאוחזין מעשה אבותיהם בידיהם הא כשאין אוחזין מעשה אבותיהם בידיהם אלא הכי קא"ל צדיק וטוב לו צדיק גמור צדיק ורע לו צדיק שאינו גמור רשע וטוב לו רשע שאינו גמור רשע ורע לו רשע גמור ופליגא דר' מאיר דא"ר מאיר שתים נתנו לו ואחת לא נתנו לו שנא' (שמות לג, יט) וחנתי את אשר אחון אע"פ שאינו הגון ורחמתי את אשר ארחם אע"פ שאינו הגון (שמות לג, כ) ויאמר לא תוכל לראות את פני תנא משמיה דר' יהושע בן קרחה כך א"ל הקב"ה למשה כשרציתי לא רצית עכשיו שאתה רוצה איני רוצה
Three things Moses sought of the Holy One, blessed be He, and He granted them. He sought that the Shekinah should rest upon Israel, and He granted it ; as it is said, "Is it not in that Thou goest with us?" (Exod. xxxiii. 16). He sought that the Shekinah should not rest upon the other peoples of the world, and He granted it ; as it is said, "So that we are distinguished, I and Thy people " (ibid.). He sought that God should show him His ways, and He granted it ; as it is said, "Show me now Thy ways" (ibid. V. 13). Moses said before Him, "Lord of the Universe, why is there a righteous man enjoying prosperity and a righteous man afflicted with adversity ? Why is there a wicked man enjoying prosperity and a wicked man afflicted with adversity?" He answered him, "Moses, the righteous man who enjoys prosperity is the son of a righteous father ; the righteous man who is afflicted with adversity is the son of a wicked father ; the wicked man who enjoys prosperity is the son of a righteous father ; the wicked man who is afflicted with adversity is the son of a wicked father." The teacher stated above: "The righteous man who enjoys prosperity is the son of a righteous father ; the righteous man who is afflicted with adversity is the son of a wicked father." But it is not so ; for lo, it is written, "Visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children" (Exod. xxxiv. 7) and it is also written, "The children shall not be put to death for the fathers" (Deut. xxiv. 16)! We set these verses one against the other and conclude there is no contradiction ; because the former passage refers to those children who continue in their fathers' ways, and the latter to those who do not continue in their fathers' ways. But [we may suppose that] God answered Moses thus wise, "The righteous man who enjoys prosperity is perfectly righteous ; the righteous man who is afflicted with adversity is not perfectly righteous ; the wicked man who enjoys prosperity is not perfectly wicked ; the wicked man who is afflicted with adversity is perfectly wicked." This is opposed to the teaching of R. Meir ; for R. Meir said that God granted two of Moses' requests and refused one. As it is said, "I will be gracious to whom I will be gracious" (Exod. xxxiii. 19), i.e. although he may not be deserving; "And I will show mercy on whom I will show mercy" (ibid.), i.e. although he may not be deserving. "And He said, Thou canst not see My face" (ibid. v. 20). It has been taught in the name of R. Joshua b. Karhah : Thus spake the Holy One, blessed be He, to Moses, "When I was willing [that thou shouldest see My face] thou wert not willing ; so now that thou art willing, I am not willing."
(א) "ויזכור אלהים את נח ואת כל החיה וגו'" וכתיב (תהלים לו, ז ): "צִדְקָתְךָ כְּהַרְרֵי אֵל מִשְׁפָּטֶיךָ תְּהוֹם רַבָּה אָדָם וּבְהֵמָה תּוֹשִׁיעַ ה'" רבי ישמעאל ורבי עקיבא. רבי ישמעאל אומר בזכות הצדיקים שקבלו את התורה שנתנה מהררי אל את עושה עמהם צדקה עד כהררי אל אבל רשעים שלא קיבלו את התורה שניתנה מהררי אל את מדקדק עמהם עד תהום רבה. ר"ע אומר אלו ואלו מדקדק עמהם עד תהום רבה מדקדק עם הצדיקים וגובה מהם מיעוט מעשים רעים שעשו בעוה"ז כדי להשפיע להם שלוה וליתן להם שכר טוב לעולם הבא משפיע שלוה לרשעים ונותן להם שכר מצות קלות שעשו בעוה"ז כדי להפרע מהן לעתיד לבא.
And God Remembered Noah and Every Living Things and all the cattle (Ge, 8:1) Your righteousness is like the mountains of God; "Your judgements are like the great deep; man and beast You preserve, O God." (Psalms 36:7) Rabbi Ishmael interpreted: To the righteous who accepted the Torah which was revealed on the mountain of God You Show Righteousness (i.e. love) reaching unto the mountains of God; but as for the wicked, who did not accept the Torah which You revealed on the mountain of God, you deal strictly with them, even to the great deep. Rabbi Akiva said: He deals Strictly with the righteous, calling them to account for the few wrongs which they commit in this world, in order to lavish bliss upon them and give them a goodly reward in the world to come;He grants ease to the wicked and rewards them for the few good deeds which they have performed in this world in order to punish them in the future world,
If he attributed them to neglect of Torah without finding any justification, it is certain that his sufferings are chastenings of love..
יסורין של אהבה - הקב"ה מייסרו בעוה"ז בלא שום עון כדי להרבות שכרו בעולם הבא יותר מכדי זכיותיו:
Chastising of love- God punishes Him in this world even without any sing in order to multiply his reward in the next world in such a way that it is more than his merits.
Faith Lectures: Judaism, Justice and Tragedy – Confronting the problem of evil
Nov. 6, 2000
http://www.rabbisacks.org/faith-lectures-judaism-justice-and-tragedy-confronting-the-problem-of-evil/
Your field is flooded. This is bad news now. On the other hand, I don’t know. Do floods improve the quality of fields? They did in the Middle East because they brought alluvial deposits and all fresh earth. So, when all the bad is over it is going to be good. You know this at the time you see the flood. You know it is bad now but it is good in the future. What bracha do you make? [Inaudible response from audience.] Is that good news or bad news? The answer is: not both. On this one, Judaism is unequivocal. You make a bracha – Dayan emet. The halachah is interested in now. It is not interested in the future. It is interested in now. In general, the halachah is interested in now. So if you have got bad news which is one day going to be good news, you still make ‘Dayan emet’. Now you understand that that Gemara which is in Brachot 60A directly contradicts the brachah on the next page, 60B, in which Rabbi Akiva says: “Whatever God does is for the best – because even though it is bad now, as I discovered, by the next morning it is good.”
There is a fat contradiction between Aggada, the world in which everything is good, and halachah in which not everything is good: in which evil is real and recognised as such by the halachah. And, of course, how do you resolve that contradiction? I said to you before, you can resolve a contradiction either by saying that it represents two different viewpoints in space, or two different viewpoints in time. Chronological of dialogical. In this case the answer lies in time.
….
You know the famous analogy, the one that Rav Soloveitchik brings: you are looking at the underside of a Persian carpet. You are looking underneath and there are all these strings and threads of different colours in apparent chaos and you don’t know what they are doing. If only you could go round to see it from the top, not from the underneath, you would see that every one of them was necessary to make this brilliant and beautiful and intricate pattern. That is how things look from God’s point of view and that is a point of view we sometimes glimpse from Tanakh and, as I say, we sometimes glimpse in life. That is the tone of voice you find in aggadah. That is the tone of voice you sometimes get when God answers the prophets.
However, that is God’s point of view. What is crucial to Judaism is that God’s point of view is not the only point of view. When God empowered us, when God asked us to be his partner in the work of creation, when God said: Let not only Me be creative, let this human being that I have made also be creative – then God made space for us and, in order to make space for us, He had to confer legitimacy on the world as it appears to us. So although God knew that all the inhabitants of Sodom and Gomorra were evil, Abraham didn’t know. Abraham didn’t know! Therefore God empowers Abraham to make the speech in their defence. Although God knew He was going to redeem the Israelites, Moses didn’t know! Therefore God empowers Moses to protest lama hari’osa le’olam hazeh. Although God knew the reasons for Job’s suffering, Job didn’t know and therefore God empowers Job to protest his innocence.

