3. Torah of Trauma Recovery: Perpetrators

Question

How do people in positions of power and authority learn and cultivate empathy?

What does one do after they perpetrate violence or trauma? Understanding the motivations, reactions, and comprehension of perpetrators is an essential element in mapping how people live after surviving trauma. Treating only the survivors in the aftermath of trauma does not address the source of the trauma. To do that, we must also look at perpetrators. We must understand how a person is lead to commit violence and develop ways of treating perpetrators holistically, moving beyond methods of punishment and into methods of rehabilitation which address the root cause for violence within the perpetrator.

No one wakes up with a spontaneous desire to do harm, or aims to be a bad person. This is the flip side, the preventative care side, to healing from trauma. Cultivating empathy even when we are in power. Learning how people do this. Learning to recognize when we are in power. Learning how to deal with the whirlwind of emotions that arise in our relationships with things like failure, rejection, disconnection, entitlement, isolation, and hatred.

Work

Many clients grappled with the desire to understand how someone could have this to me? Sometimes family members, clergy, teachers, police, people they trusted or even expected protection from were the ones who tortured them. Part of the trauma manifested as a fear - if that person could do that to me, what if there are others who could hurt me? If the people I trusted hurt me, how can I tell who I can truly trust in the future? Why am I hated? This kind of thinking can lead into even more dangerous territory: What did I do to deserve this? Why didn't I do (insert the blank) or not do not (X), if I had been better/smarter this would not have happened to me. The last thought in a series like this is often I need to stay vigilant so that this doesn't happen again.

Sometimes the response to these questions is a healthy indignant, an outrage, and also a world crumbling disbelief and disillusionment.

We as practitioners also need to genuinely understand - how could someone be capable of this violence? By only treating victims on case-by-case basis we do nothing to interrupt the cycles of violence. We must understand each source of violence in order to interrupt it at the actor as well as the survivor.

Work Map onto working with sex offenders who did not understand they had done harm

Question

Communal vs individual responsibility as well as trauma. If there can be a communal trauma, can there also be communal or collective responsibility?

(see Amnon's rape is orchestrated and encouraged by his cousin)

Order: Amnon raping Tamar/David murdering Uriel, Joseph and his brothers, zoom back to Cain, then reflect/map onto my own experiences, and the #MeToo movement (30-minutes teaching, 10-15 minutes questions, 10-15 minutes group discussion of how does this relate to my life?)

וְה֖וּא עָבַ֣ר לִפְנֵיהֶ֑ם וַיִּשְׁתַּ֤חוּ אַ֙רְצָה֙ שֶׁ֣בַע פְּעָמִ֔ים עַד־גִּשְׁתּ֖וֹ עַד־אָחִֽיו׃. וַיָּ֨רָץ עֵשָׂ֤ו לִקְרָאתוֹ֙ וַֽיְחַבְּקֵ֔הוּ וַיִּפֹּ֥ל עַל־צַוָּארָ֖ו וַׄיִּׄשָּׁׄקֵ֑ׄהׄוּׄ וַיִּבְכּֽוּ׃

He himself went on ahead and bowed low to the ground seven times until he was near his brother. (34) Esau ran to greet him. He embraced him and, falling on his neck, he kissed him; and they wept.

Is Jacob approaching so carefully as a way to apologize to his brother, to recognize the harm he caused Esau? Or out of fear for how Esau wanted to kill him? Maybe both. Here we see a model: it is scary to confront the harm you have done, and it is possible to face it humbly still. To hold one's own feelings and recognize the harm you caused the other is what opens the door for potential repair of relationship or healing for the person you harmed. Both weep! Both the perp and survivor in this case weep.

(ז) וַתִּגַּ֧שׁ גַּם־לֵאָ֛ה וִילָדֶ֖יהָ וַיִּֽשְׁתַּחֲו֑וּ וְאַחַ֗ר נִגַּ֥שׁ יוֹסֵ֛ף וְרָחֵ֖ל וַיִּֽשְׁתַּחֲוֽוּ׃
(7) next Leah, with her children, came forward and bowed low; and last, Joseph and Rachel came forward and bowed low;

Really interesting that Joseph sees the reunion of Jacob and Esau as a child - how does this impact his own experience of brotherly reunion in the future?

(ב) וַיִּתֵּ֥ן אֶת־קֹל֖וֹ בִּבְכִ֑י וַיִּשְׁמְע֣וּ מִצְרַ֔יִם וַיִּשְׁמַ֖ע בֵּ֥ית פַּרְעֹֽה׃
(2) His sobs were so loud that the Egyptians could hear, and so the news reached Pharaoh’s palace.

וַיַּ֥רְא יוֹסֵ֛ף אֶת־אֶחָ֖יו וַיַּכִּרֵ֑ם וַיִּתְנַכֵּ֨ר אֲלֵיהֶ֜ם וַיְדַבֵּ֧ר אִתָּ֣ם קָשׁ֗וֹת וַיֹּ֤אמֶר אֲלֵהֶם֙ מֵאַ֣יִן בָּאתֶ֔ם וַיֹּ֣אמְר֔וּ מֵאֶ֥רֶץ כְּנַ֖עַן לִשְׁבָּר־אֹֽכֶל׃

When Joseph saw his brothers, he recognized them; but he acted like a stranger toward them and spoke harshly to them. He asked them, “Where do you come from?” And they said, “From the land of Canaan, to procure food.”

foreshadowing the hardening of pharaoh's heart?

Joseph is disassociating? What's going on for him internally?

וַיִּפֹּ֛ל עַל־צַוְּארֵ֥י בִנְיָמִֽן־אָחִ֖יו וַיֵּ֑בְךְּ וּבִנְיָמִ֔ן בָּכָ֖ה עַל־צַוָּארָֽיו׃ (15) וַיְנַשֵּׁ֥ק לְכָל־אֶחָ֖יו וַיֵּ֣בְךְּ עֲלֵיהֶ֑ם וְאַ֣חֲרֵי כֵ֔ן דִּבְּר֥וּ אֶחָ֖יו אִתּֽוֹ

With that he embraced his brother Benjamin around the neck and wept, and Benjamin wept on his neck. (15) He kissed all his brothers and wept upon them; only then were his brothers able to talk to him.

same word for crying used in the reunion of Jacob and Esau, which Joseph witnessed as a child, is used in his reunion with his brothers.

He needed to see the sorrow/regret/tshuva of his brothers just as Esau saw and took pity on Jacob's apology?

removed source: Bereshit 45:2 Joseph's initial weeping reunion with his brothers and that the Pharaoh could hear - process of healing impacting the backdrop of current life is a concern? could use that in the name change piece?

Joseph needed to see tshuva from his brothers so put them through the test with their younger brother Benjamin. Seeing how his brothers tried to protect Benjamin and their father Jacob from the pain of losing Benjamin, Joseph sees his brothers' repentance from his own trauma. His brothers have changed and he can forgive them, as he saw his Uncle Esau forgive his father Jacob.

Also his brothers couldn't interact with Joseph as their brother without this process - once Joseph tells them the story of what happened to him and also says what he wants to do from here (see his father, provide food for their family). In seeing Joseph while protecting Benjamin, his brothers are forced to contend with and fully understand their past violence to Joseph. Their failure to protect Joseph and their father is a painful contrast to their changed behavior with Benjamin. Also, they think they are going to die in the famine and are put into a test about their brother Benjamin, then realize the brother they betrayed is the one who will decide their fate. This must be frightening. Do they think they are going to die? Are they afraid?

There is something transformative in this type of weeping (same hebrew root used): Jacob and Esau reunite, Joseph and brothers reunite, Joseph and Benjamin meet, Joseph when Jacob dies. does this overlap with the trauma healing process that is grief, death of the old/birth of the new

בְּסֹדָם֙ אַל־תָּבֹ֣א נַפְשִׁ֔י בִּקְהָלָ֖ם אַל־תֵּחַ֣ד כְּבֹדִ֑י כִּ֤י בְאַפָּם֙ הָ֣רְגוּ אִ֔ישׁ וּבִרְצֹנָ֖ם עִקְּרוּ־שֽׁוֹר׃
Let not my person be included in their council, Let not my being be counted in their assembly. For when angry they slay men, And when pleased they maim oxen.

different levels of tshuva for different brothers involved in the same crime? do we see any attempt from Simon and Levi to do tshuva? perhaps showing different routes post-crime: do tshuva and heal or don't and be cut out?

Do I want to explore/bring in Rambam's Mishneh Torah: is there such thing as beyond redemption? Unforgivable?

Talk about Pharaoh's heart being hardened by God - so how can he be responsible? Or is this metaphorical for how perpetration is possible?

וַיִּשְׂנָאֶ֣הָ אַמְנ֗וֹן שִׂנְאָה֙ גְּדוֹלָ֣ה מְאֹ֔ד כִּ֣י גְדוֹלָ֗ה הַשִּׂנְאָה֙ אֲשֶׁ֣ר שְׂנֵאָ֔הּ מֵאַהֲבָ֖ה אֲשֶׁ֣ר אֲהֵבָ֑הּ וַֽיֹּאמֶר־לָ֥הּ אַמְנ֖וֹן ק֥וּמִי לֵֽכִי׃

Then Amnon felt a very great loathing for her; indeed, his loathing for her was greater than the passion he had felt for her. And Amnon said to her, “Get out!”

Amnon's cousin encourages and helps devise a plan for the rape to happen. Why? What is his role in this rape?

Is his disgust a commentary on our lack of knowledge - what do we do when we have perpetrated violence? How do we deal with the aftermath of our own harm?

(כז) וַיַּעֲבֹ֣ר הָאֵ֗בֶל וַיִּשְׁלַ֨ח דָּוִ֜ד וַיַּאַסְפָ֤הּ אֶל־בֵּיתוֹ֙ וַתְּהִי־ל֣וֹ לְאִשָּׁ֔ה וַתֵּ֥לֶד ל֖וֹ בֵּ֑ן וַיֵּ֧רַע הַדָּבָ֛ר אֲשֶׁר־עָשָׂ֥ה דָוִ֖ד בְּעֵינֵ֥י ה'׃ (פ)
(27) After the period of mourning was over, David sent and had her brought into his palace; she became his wife and she bore him a son. But the LORD was displeased with what David had done,

David, like his son Amnon in the future will, uses his position of power to rape a women he desires. He goes through steps to try to cover up the pregnancy but ultimately kills Uriel, Batsheva's husband.

What's the significance of David waiting for the mourning period to be over before taking Batsheva into his own house?

Why is it God who is displeased with David, and not David who feels any remorse during the murder or Uriel or the lamentations of his widow?

וְהַמֶּ֣לֶךְ דָּוִ֔ד שָׁמַ֕ע אֵ֥ת כָּל־הַדְּבָרִ֖ים הָאֵ֑לֶּה וַיִּ֥חַר ל֖וֹ מְאֹֽד׃

When King David heard about all this, he was greatly upset.

Why is David distressed when he hears this happened? He himself raped Batsheva and murdered her husband - does this remind him of his past actions, of God saying the sword will not lift from his generations

Mirroring: neither David nor Amnon are able to reflect on their own violent behavior. Both have a power figure (God to David, then David to Amnon) who reflects their actions back to them. Larger context on our responsibility to interrupt violence/abuse. Someone from outside the situation must interrupt it. Also larger responsibility is on us to learn from our own crimes/mistakes so that we can see them in others/the future.

Septuagint adds “but he did not rebuke his son Amnon, for he favored him, since he was his first-born”; cf. 1 Kings 1.6.

is this why/reflective of the theme of younger sons overthrowing older sons? because older sons will beget injustice?

וַיֹּ֥אמֶר קַ֖יִן אֶל־הֶ֣בֶל אָחִ֑יו וַֽיְהִי֙ בִּהְיוֹתָ֣ם בַּשָּׂדֶ֔ה וַיָּ֥קָם קַ֛יִן אֶל־הֶ֥בֶל אָחִ֖יו וַיַּהַרְגֵֽהוּ׃
Cain said to his brother Abel … and when they were in the field, Cain set upon his brother Abel and killed him.
וַיֹּ֧אמֶר ל֣וֹ ה' לָכֵן֙ כָּל־הֹרֵ֣ג קַ֔יִן שִׁבְעָתַ֖יִם יֻקָּ֑ם וַיָּ֨שֶׂם ה' לְקַ֙יִן֙ א֔וֹת לְבִלְתִּ֥י הַכּוֹת־אֹת֖וֹ כָּל־מֹצְאֽוֹ׃
The LORD said to him, “I promise, if anyone kills Cain, sevenfold vengeance shall be taken on him.” And the LORD put a mark on Cain, lest anyone who met him should kill him.
שבעתים יקם. אֵינִי רוֹצֶה לְהִנָּקֵם מִקַּיִן עַכְשָׁו, לְסוֹף שִׁבְעָה דוֹרוֹת אֲנִי נוֹקֵם נִקְמָתִי מִמֶּנּוּ, שֶׁיַּעֲמֹד לֶמֶךְ מִבְּנֵי בָּנָיו וְיַהַרְגֵהוּ, וְסוֹף הַמִּקְרָא שֶׁאָמַר שִׁבְעָתַיִם יֻקָּם, וְהִיא נִקְמַת הֶבֶל מִקַּיִן, לִמְּדָנוּ שֶׁתְּחִלַּת מִקְרָא לְשׁוֹן גְּעָרָה הִיא, שֶׁלֹּא תְהֵא בְרִיָּה מַזִּיקַתּוּ, וְכַיּוֹצֵא בוֹ וַיֹּאמֶר דָּוִד כָּל מַכֵּה יְבֻסִי וְיִגַּע בַּצִּנּוֹר (שמואל ב ה'), וְלֹא פֵּרֵשׁ מַה יֵּעָשֶׂה לוֹ, אֲבָל דִּבֵּר הַכָּתוּב בְּרֶמֶז כָּל מַכֵּה יְבֻסִי וְיִגַּע בַּצִּנּוֹר וְיִקְרַב אֶל הַשַּׁעַר וְיִכְבְּשֶׁנּוּ וְאֶת הָעִוְרִים וגו', וְגַם אוֹתָם יַכֶּה עַל אֲשֶׁר אָמְרוּ הָעִוֵּר וְהַפִּסֵּחַ לֹא יָבֹא דָוִד אֶל תּוֹךְ הַבַּיִת – הַמַּכֶּה אֶת אֵלּוּ אֲנִי אֶעֱשֶׂנּוּ רֹאשׁ וְשַׂר, כָּאן קִצֵּר דְּבָרָיו, וּבְדִבְרֵי הַיָּמִים פֵּרֵשׁ יִהְיֶה לְרֹאשׁ וּלְשָׂר:
שבעתים יקם VENGEANCE SHALL BE TAKEN SEVENFOLD — God says, I do not wish to take vengeance on Cain now, but at the end of seven generations I will execute my vengeance upon him, that Lamech, one of his descendants, will arise and slay him. The end of this verse which states, “vengeance shall be taken in the seventh generation” — which is the vengeance taken on Cain for Abel — teaches us that the first part of the verse is a threat made in order that no creature might injure him. A similar elliptical expression is the following: (2 Samuel 5:8) “And David said, whosoever smiteth the Jebusites and getteth up to the gutter” — but it does not explicitly state what would be done to that person. Scripture, however, here speaks by a suggestion only, meaning, whosoever smiteth the Jebusites and getteth up to the gutter and approacheth the gate and conquereth it and the blind etc. … slaying also them (the blind and the lame) because they said, “there are the blind and the lame: David cannot come into the house” — he who smiteth these, I shall make him chief and captain. Here (in the Book of Samuel) it abridges the narrative, but in Chronicles (1 Chronicles 11:6) it explicitly states, “he shall become chief and captain.”
וַיֵּ֥צֵא קַ֖יִן מִלִּפְנֵ֣י ה' וַיֵּ֥שֶׁב בְּאֶֽרֶץ־נ֖וֹד קִדְמַת־עֵֽדֶן׃
Cain left the presence of the LORD and settled in the land of Nod, east of Eden.

Cain was in the presence of the Lord! Even after committing murder

Sometimes after doing something you need to give space to those in the surviving area, and need a new place to transform yourself?

ויתהלך חנוך. צַדִּיק הָיָה וְקַל בְּדַעְתּוֹ לָשׁוּב לְהַרְשִׁיעַ, לְפִיכָךְ מִהֵר הַקָּבָּ"ה וְסִלְּקוֹ וֶהֱמִיתוֹ קֹדֶם זְמַנּוֹ, וְזֶהוּ שֶׁשִּׁנָּה הַכָּתוּב בְּמִיתָתוֹ לִכְתֹּב וְאֵינֶנּוּ בָּעוֹלָם – לְמַלְּאוֹת שְׁנוֹתָיו ‏(בראשית רבה):
ויתהלך חנוך AND ENOCH WALKED [WITH GOD] — He was a righteous man, but his mind was easily induced) to turn from his righteous ways and to become wicked. The Holy One, blessed be He, therefore took him away quickly and made him die before his full time. This is why Scripture uses a different expression when referring to his death by writing ואיננו “and he was not”, meaning, he was not in the world to complete the number of his years.

What does it mean that Enoch walked with God? He is a descendant of Cain

וַיִּקְרָ֧א אֶת־שְׁמ֛וֹ נֹ֖חַ לֵאמֹ֑ר זֶ֠ה יְנַחֲמֵ֤נוּ מִֽמַּעֲשֵׂ֙נוּ֙ וּמֵעִצְּב֣וֹן יָדֵ֔ינוּ מִן־הָ֣אֲדָמָ֔ה אֲשֶׁ֥ר אֵֽרְרָ֖הּ ה'׃
And he named him Noah, saying, “This one will provide us relief from our work and from the toil of our hands, out of the very soil which the LORD placed under a curse.”

Again, NOAH IS FROM THE LINE OF CAIN AND UNDOES THE CURSE FINALLY very long view intergenerational healing

Is Noah living in the city Cain established after the murder?

How can someone from Cain's family be righteous among his generation?

Is Noah's righteousness relative to those he lives among (ie the rest of Cain's descendants are more severely living out the negative cycle of violence from their family history?)

Complicated: is Noah going to deal with living while he knows the world around him is dying, all the people he knows/sees/interacts with regularly will die. Noah's healing of Cain's history: healing is good and also carries responsibility within it. Not clear cut heal and move on. Heal for the possibility of a future.

God's regret for creating humanity is tied directly to Noah, Cain's descendant. What does it mean that humanity will survive through Noah?

How might the covenant offered to Noah mirror God's conversation with Cain after the murder?

Map onto my own experiences:

Growing up learning and living in racism in Westchester

Dad's role as bankruptcy lawyer in 2008 financial crash

Am I responsible for the family/ancestor's actions? Not yes but also not no. I benefit from them, I learn from them without realizing it and need to unlearn. Have responsibility to past and future generations to move the healing tick for myself and for those my family may have harmed.

Same for Israel and Jews - this question of who are we now that we are in power? How do we behave now that we have power?

Cain

- kills his brother (rejection proceeds murder)

- gets one on one conversation with God even after murdering his brother

- is told for seven generations his family will be cursed

- this is not punitive

- this is a guide for the future, way forward, acknowledging a complex reality

- mark/curse of Cain gives him and his future family a chance to due tshuva

- Cain cannot get out of dealing with his actions through death, nor through being so afraid of death that he does not focus on his own actions

- God is also going through regret of creating humanity and having to live with that - is God uncomfortable with how humanity is reflecting back God's own weaknesses, traumas, etc. ?

- reality of collective and individual responsibility!

Joseph

Is with Jacob when Jacob and Esau reunite/reconcile

Sees a model - Jacob as the perp, trying to face what he has done and the person he harmed (feels fear! feels like the victim even though he is not)

Also there is a limitation to their reconciliation - J/E?

Does Joseph take this model into his own reconciliation with his brothers in Egypt?

Shame and Masculinity

What if we accept that we come from trauma (certainly collectively at least as Jews) but also likely specific to our own family and what we are taught of how to be masculine/men

And that we have the potential to heal and the potential to do harm

That we need to learn when we are in a role of power

As men, we learn certain behaviors. In the MeToo movement, I wonder if instead of reacting with shock, fear, surprise, denial of the harm we do, we can acknowledge that we all learned this system. It is impossible that we didn't. It's impossible that we have never caused any harm to anyone as a result of what we were taught. Take away the shame. Acknowledge that we must have harmed others before and almost certainly will harm again. Acknowledge spectrum of harm. (Like Cain) Be open to seeing this not as a curse but as an opportunity for healing ourselves and doing tshuva. (obviously some perpetrations are way more aggregious than others)

I want to believe that trauma is not the only way to learn empathy. It was one way. Two routes post-trauma: harden or soften. Stoic exceptionalism of my survival or empathetic ability to see and care for others in their struggles.

I want to believe that no one is too far gone, either as a survivor or a perpetrator, to recover. Recovery meaning to connect with other human beings, to live embodied lives, to do tshuva, whether collective or individual.

Taking out a block of someone's mental janga: what support am I offering to put in the place of what I am trying to take out?

Healing - both in relationship and in individual process