Duties of a Leader
(12) ה' said to Moses, “Ascend these heights of Abarim and view the land that I have given to the Israelite people. (13) When you have seen it, you too shall be gathered to your kin [i.e. die], just as your brother Aaron was. (14) For, in the wilderness of Zin, when the community was contentious, you disobeyed My command to uphold My sanctity in their sight by means of the water.” Those are the Waters of Meribath-kadesh, in the wilderness of Zin. (15) Moses spoke to ה', saying, (16) “Let ה', Source of the breath of all flesh, appoint someone over the community (17) who shall go out before them and come in before them, and who shall take them out and bring them in, so that 'ה’s community may not be like sheep that have no shepherd.”
- What does it look like to be sheep that have no shepherd?
- How does it feel to the sheep? Where is the shepherd?
- Who on camp is the shepherd and who the sheep? Does this ever change?
- Think about the duties Moses supplies for the new leader in verse 17. What do you think that is about?
What are we doing when we do hadracha?
The Piaseczner Rebbe was born in Poland in 1889. He became the Rebbe of Piaseczno (in Poland), and was deeply committed to education of children and teenagers.
After Nazi Germany invaded Poland, the Piaseczner ("Pee-a-zetz-ner") Rebbe was interned in the Warsaw Ghetto. He ran a secret synagogue in the ghetto and made a huge effort to maintain Jewish life, including carrying out weddings and mikveh immersions. When the ghetto was liquidated, he was taken to Trawniki concentration camp where he was later killed.
Chovat HaTalmidim is a collection of essays aimed at teenage yeshiva students which has become a standard textbook in yeshivot. It was one of the only texts by the Piaseczner Rebbe which was published in his lifetime. Most of the rest of his works were found after World War Two buried in a milk canister in the Warsaw Ghetto.
משלי (כ"ב, ו'): "חנוך לנער על פי דרכו גם כי יזקין לא יסור ממנה". זה הוא עיקר החנוך שלא בלבד בשעה שהנער נער, ויד אביו עודה תקיפה עליו ישמע לו ויעשה כמצותיו, רק גם כשיגדל והוא ברשותו, אף כי יזקין לא יסור ממנה. כי החנוך לא צווי לבד הוא, שמצוה את בנו או תלמידו עשה כך וכך, גם לא הרגל בלבד הוא, שמרגילו לעשות מעשים טובים, יותר גדול ויותר פועל מן הצווי ומן ההרגל הוא החנוך, ושני אלה הצווי וההרגל רק כלי תשמישו הם, שהמחנך מוכרח להשתמש בהם, לצוותו ולהרגילו, כדי לחנכו בדרך ד'.
Proverbs 22:6, "Teach (chanoch - the same root as "chanich") the youth according to their path, so that also in their old age they will not veer away from it." This is the core of education: the youth shouldn't only listen to their parent when they are young and subject to their parents' discipline, and then when they grow up abandon the teaching. Instead, when the youth grows up and becomes independent, "in their old age they will not veer away from it".
Because education (chinuch) is not only commands that people tell their children or students, "do this", "do that". It also isn't just a habit, to be in the habit of doing good things. Education is greater and more active than just commands and habits. And these two things - commands and habit - are simply tools used in its implementation which the educator needs to use; to command or habituate the student, in order to educate them in the path of God.
...כי המצוה והמרגיל בלבד, אינו צריך לתן לב אל הבן והתלמיד, לדעת את טבעם ושכלם וכו', עליו רק לצוות עשה כך או כך ודי לו, גם אינו מרגיש חוב בעצמו לטפל בכל תלמיד ותלמיד בפני עצמו, יוכל הוא לצוות להרבה תלמידים בני גיל אחד צווי אחד, עשו כך או כך, כי לא בתלמיד או בבן, רק בו, במצוה בלבד הדבר תלוי, הוא יצוה וזהו הוא הכל. אבל המחנך שרוצה לגלות את נשמת התלמיד הטמונה והגנוזה בו, לגדלה ולהבעירה שתבער באש של מעלה למרום וקדוש, וכלו – אף כחי גופו בקדשה יתגדלו ולתורת ד' ישתוקק, מכרח הוא להרכין את עצמו אל התלמיד המתחנך על ידו, ולחדר אל תוך קטנותו ונמיכותו, עד אשר יגיע אל ניצוץ נשמתו הגנוזה אף נעלמה ולהוציאה, ולהצמיחה ולגדלה.
... One who only commands and habituates does not need to pay attention to the son or student, to know his nature or intellect, etc. He only has to command, "Do this and that," and that is enough. He will also not feel his own need to treat each and every student differently. He is able to command many students of the same age with one command - "Do this and that." For this thing is not dependent on the student or child, but rather only on him. He will command and that will be the end of it. But an educator who wants to reveal the hidden and stored away soul of the student, to uplift it and set it on fire with a divine fire that reaches the Highest Holy One, such that all of him - even the powers of his body - grows in holiness and pines for God's Torah, he is required to soften himself towards the student that he is educating. He must delve into his juvenility and smallness until he reaches the spark of his stored away - or even hidden - soul, bring it out, develop it and grow it.
Are there advantages to a one-size-fits-all hadracha, or is the Piazescner's preferred tailored approach always best?
What do you think it looks like to "delve into [the chanich's] juvenility and smallness"?
Why do you think the Piaseczner Rebbe thinks we should do this?
Have you had a moment where you felt you "reached the hidden spark" under a chanich's smallness? Has anyone on camp ever reached your spark?
Taking a Break
דַּע, כִּי עִקָּר הַחַיִּים הִיא הַתּוֹרָה, כְּמוֹ שֶׁכָּתוּב: כִּי הוּא חַיֶּיךָ וְאֹרֶךְ יָמֶיךָ (דברים ל׳:כ׳), וְכָל הַפּוֹרֵשׁ מִן הַתּוֹרָה כְּפוֹרֵשׁ מִן הַחַיִּים (זוהר לך לך דף צב, בהעלותך דף קמח, ואתחנן דף רס). וְעַל־כֵּן לִכְאוֹרָה הַדָּבָר תָּמוּהַּ וְנִפְלָא, אֵיךְ אֶפְשָׁר לִפְרֹשׁ עַצְמוֹ מִן הַתּוֹרָה אֲפִלּוּ שָׁעָה קַלָּה.
וּבֶאֱמֶת זֶהוּ מִן הַנִּמְנָע וּבִלְתִּי אֶפְשָׁר לִהְיוֹת דָּבוּק בְּהַתּוֹרָה, תָּמִיד יוֹמָם וָלַיְלָה, בְּלִי הֶפְסֵק רֶגַע, וְכָל בַּעַל־תּוֹרָה, הֵן לַמְדָן שֶׁעוֹסֵק בְּלִמּוּד הַתּוֹרָה בְּגמפ"ת [בִּגְמָרָא, פֵּרוּשׁ רַשִׁ"י, תּוֹסָפוֹת] וְכַיּוֹצֵא, כָּל אֶחָד כְּפִי עֶרְכּוֹ, כְּפִי עֵסֶק לִמּוּדוֹ, בְּהֶכְרֵחַ שֶׁיִּבָּטֵל מֵהַתּוֹרָה אֵיזֶה שָׁעָה בַּיּוֹם. וְכֵן אֲפִלּוּ בַּעַל הַשָּׂגָה, וַאֲפִלּוּ מִי שֶׁהוּא גָּבוֹהַּ יוֹתֵר וְיוֹתֵר לְמַעְלָה לְמַעְלָה, אַף־עַל־פִּי־כֵן בְּהֶכְרֵחַ שֶׁיַּפְסִיק וְיִבָטֵּל מֵהַשָּׂגָתוֹ אֵיזֶה זְמַן, כִּי אִי אֶפְשָׁר לִהְיוֹת דָּבוּק תָּמִיד בְּתוֹרָה וְהַשָּׂגָה בְּלִי הֶפְסֵק. כִּי צְרִיכִין בְּהֶכְרֵחַ לְהַפְסִיק אֵיזֶה שָׁעָה, אִם לַעֲשׂוֹת אֵיזֶה מַשָּׂא־וּמַתָּן אוֹ כַּיּוֹצֵא בָּזֶה, כִּי צְרִיכִין לַעֲסֹק בְּצָרְכֵי הַגּוּף גַם־כֵּן.
Know! the Torah is the essence of life, as it is written, “for it is your life and the length of your days” (Deuteronomy 30:20). Anyone who separates from the Torah it is as if he separates from life (Zohar I, 92a). Therefore, on the face of it, the matter is puzzling and amazing. How is it possible to separate oneself from the Torah even for a short while?
In fact, it is unavoidable; it is impossible to be constantly attached to the Torah, day and night, without a moment’s interruption. Every Torah devotee, including the scholar who studies Talmud and its commentators, and the like—each one commensurate with his level, according to the subject matter he studies—must absent himself from the Torah for some time during the day. The same is true also of one with deep mystical insight, and also of one who is much, much loftier. Even so, he must interrupt and set aside his perceiving for a while, because it is impossible to continuously cleave to Torah or mystical perception, without interruption. Of necessity one must stop for a while, to engage in some business or the like, because one must also care for the body’s needs.
Rebbe Nachman of Breslov was born in 1772 in Poland. He was the great-grandson of Baal Shem Tov and one of the revivers of the Chasidic movement by combining Kaballah and in-depth Torah study. He accumulated thousands of followers in his lifetime and still has a huge influence of many Chasidic dynasties today (including of Na Nach Nachma Nachman M'Uman fame).
Likutei Moharan is a collection of Rebbe Nachman's teachings. Rebbe Nachman believed that Torah study was essential but also believed in self-care and encouraged his followers to take at least one hour out of their day to be alone in conversation with G-d (Hitbodedus).
- How do you feel when you take a break from hadracha?
- What do you take breaks for?
- What helps to "keep the world turning" when you take a break?
- Do you feel like you receive unearned kindnesses?
Breaking it down
(ד) וְהִנֵּה לִפְעָמִים הַהֶכְרֵחַ לִתֵּן לְהַחוֹלֶה אֵיזֶה סַם, אֲשֶׁר אִם יִתְּנוּ לוֹ הַסַּם בְּעַצְמוֹ כְּמוֹ שֶׁהוּא, יָמוּת הַחוֹלֶה בְּלִי סָפֵק, עַל־כֵּן הַהֶכְרֵחַ לְעָרֵב הַסַּם בִּדְבָרִים אֲחֵרִים.
(ה) כֵּן יֵשׁ אֲנָשִׁים, שֶׁאִי אֶפְשָׁר לְגַלּוֹת לָהֶם פְּנִימִיּוּת הַתּוֹרָה הַצָּרִיךְ לִרְפוּאָתוֹ, כִּי הַתּוֹרָה הִיא רְפוּאָה, כְּמוֹ שֶׁכָּתוּב (משלי ג׳:ח׳): רִפְאוּת תְּהִי לְשָׁרֶךָ; כִּי בְּהַתּוֹרָה יֵשׁ שְׁנֵי כֹּחוֹת: סַם חַיִּים וְסַם מָוֶת, כְּמוֹ שֶׁאָמְרוּ רַבּוֹתֵינוּ זִכְרוֹנָם לִבְרָכָה (יומא עב:): זָכָה – נַעֲשֶׂה לוֹ סַם חַיִּים; לֹא זָכָה – נַעֲשֶׂה לוֹ סַם הַמָּוֶת.
(ו) וְעַל כֵּן אִם יֹאמְרוּ לוֹ הַתּוֹרָה בְּעַצְמָהּ כְּמוֹ שֶׁהִיא, יָמוּת בְּלִי סָפֵק, כִּי אֶצְלוֹ שֶׁלֹּא זָכָה נַעֲשֶׂה סַם מָוֶת, עַל־כֵּן הַהֶכְרֵחַ לְהַלְבִּישׁ לוֹ פְּנִימִיּוּת הַתּוֹרָה בְּדִבְרֵי תּוֹרָה אֲחֵרִים,
(ז) וְלִפְעָמִים גַּם זֶה אֵינוֹ יָכוֹל לְקַבֵּל אַף אִם יַלְבִּישׁוֹ בְּדִבְרֵי תּוֹרָה אֲחֵרִים. עַל־כֵּן מַלְבִּישִׁין הַתּוֹרָה בְּסִפּוּרֵי דְּבָרִים חִיצוֹנִיִּים, לְמַעַן יוּכַל לְקַבֵּל הָרְפוּאָה הַגְּנוּזָה שָׁם. כִּי גַּם הַתּוֹרָה בְּעַצְמָהּ מְלֻבֶּשֶׁת עַתָּה בְּסִפּוּרֵי מַעֲשִׂיּוֹת, מֵחֲמַת שֶׁלֹּא הָיָה אֶפְשָׁר לְמָסְרָהּ כְּמוֹת שֶׁהִיא:
(4) Now, sometimes, it is vital that the sick person be given a certain medication, but if given the medication itself, straight, the sick person will undoubtedly die. It is therefore necessary to mix the medication with other things.
(5) So, too, there are people to whom it is impossible to reveal the inner teachings of the Torah that are needed to heal them. For the Torah is called a cure, as it is written (Proverbs 3:8), “It shall be a healing for your navel.” For there is a dual force in the Torah: [it can be] an elixir of life or a potion of death. As our Sages teach: If one is worthy, it becomes an elixir of life; if one is not worthy, it becomes a potion of death (Yoma 72b).
(6) Therefore, if they tell him the Torah itself, straight, he will undoubtedly die. In his case, because he is not worthy, it becomes a potion of death. Consequently, for him, it is necessary to enclothe the inner teachings of the Torah in other Torah teachings.
(7) Sometimes, he is not even able to tolerate this, even if it is enclothed in other Torah teachings. So they enclothe the Torah in mundane, everyday conversations, in order for him to be able to take the cure that is hidden there. For the Torah, too, is presently enclothed in stories, because it is impossible to give it over straight.
- Why would unadulterated Divine Truth be dangerous for someone?
- Are there moments in your life where you feel you have to dilute something for the sake of the listener?
- Does it feel like a compromise?
- Rebbe Nachman thinks of the stories in the Torah as tools for getting to the Truth and remaining unharmed. Does this sound right to you? What tools of dilution do you use?
Obligation - a theology of childcare
This is a text by Dr Mara Benjamin, a contemporary feminist theologian - an extract from her book The Obligated Self. She is talking about a midrash (rabbinic story) that God held Mount Sinai over the Jews "like a barrel" and threatened to squash us if we didn't accept the Torah, essentially forcing us to accept it. We then re-accept it during the Purim story.
This aspect of our existence can be veiled from us... To live with and be responsible for a newborn, a baby, a toddler, is to suddenly wake up to one’s un-freedom. It means having the concrete experience, dozens of times each day, of being beholden to another. This un-freedom feels at times like slavery (‘avdut) and at times like service (‘avodah). But this condition, so acutely, viscerally, and materially experienced in caring for a young child, reveals a basic, but easily occluded, fact of existence. Maternity lifts, sometimes rips, the veil from our eyes, opening us to recognizing our conditionality.
And yet, as the midrash conveys, we cannot simply submit, if the act of compliance is to retain its ethical force. If we are threatened into submission to this world of obligation, the system is morally and psychologically unsustainable; gravity becomes domination. Agency is crucial to human flourishing, even if it consists only in affirming the conditionality of our existence and thus upholding what we were forced to accept. The midrash insists on human agency as ethically necessary in affirming the conditions of our existence.
We always stand “under the mountain,” positioned only to respond to the conditionality of our being and of the others who constitute our being in the world. Our freedom consists not in casting off all that binds us, but rather in recognizing that our boundedness and our agency are each parts of greater whole.
...
The theological implications of this pursuit are admittedly startling: if the rabbinic notion of obligation comes into felt experience most viscerally in caring for young children, then God is not an overlord but a vulnerable, dependent being who needs virtually constant attention. This concept inverts the biblical metaphorical economy, in which God is parent, not infant, and the rabbinic sources that speak of God as king and as father, not as subject or son.
--- Dr Mara Benjamin, The Obligated Self
- How does it feel to be constantly "on duty" for other people's needs?
- Do you feel like you knew what you were getting yourself into?
- Does Dr Benjamin change the way you think about Judaism on camp?

