LiveOnNY: Pikuakh Nefesh- Obligations and Limitations
How much danger must we put ourselves in to save someone's life?
User uploaded image

מְנַיִין שֶׁסְּפֵק נְפָשׁוֹת דּוֹחֶה אֶת הַשַּׁבָּת. רִבִּי אַבָּהוּ בְשֵׁם רִבִּי יוֹחָנָן. אַךְ אֶת שַׁבְּתוֹתַיי תִּשְׁמֹרוּ. מִיעוּט. אִית דְּבָעֵי מֵימַר. אָמְרָה תוֹרָה. חַלֵּל עָלָיו שַׁבָּת. והוּא יוֹשֵׁב וּמָשַׁמֵּר שַׁבָּתוֹת הַרְבֶּה. רִבִּי זְעוּרָה רִבִּי חִיָיה בְשֵׁם רִבִּי יוֹחָנָן. מָבוֹי שֶׁכּוּלּוֹ גוֹיִם וְיִשְׂרָאֵל אֶחָד דָּר בְּתוֹכוֹ. וְנָפְלָה בוֹ מַפּוֹלֶת. מְפַקְּחִין עָלָיו בִּשְׁבִיל יִשְׂרָאֵל שֶׁלְשָׁם. עַד אֵיכָן. תְּרֵין אֲמוֹרִין. חַד אָמַר. עַד חוֹטְמוֹ. וְחוֹרָנָה אָמַר. עַד טִיבּוּרוֹ. מָאן דְּאָמַר. עַד חוֹטְמוֹ. בָּהוּא דַהֲוָה קַיָים. וּמָאן דְּאָמַר. עַד טִיבּוּרוֹ. בָּהוּא דַהֲוָה רָבִין. תַּנֵּי. (הַדַּיִין מְשׁוּבָּח. וְהַנִּשְׁאַל מְעַתֵּד.) [הַזָּרִיז מְשׁוּבָּח. וְהַנִּשְׁאַל מְגוּנֶּה] וְהַשּׁוֹאֵל הֲרֵי זֶה שׁוֹפֵךְ דָּמִים. תַּנֵּי. כָּל דָּבָר שֶׁהוּא שֶׁל סַכָּנָה אֵין אוֹמְרִין. יֵעָשׂוּ דְבָרִים בַּגּוֹיִם וּבִקְטַנִּים. אֶלָּא אֲפִילוּ בִּגְדוֹלִים בִּיִשְׂרָאֵל. מַעֲשֶׂהַ שֶׁנָּפְלָה דְלֵיקָה בַּחֲצַירוֹ שֶׁלְיוֹסֵי בֶּן סִימַאי בְּשִׁיחִין. וְיָרְדוּ בְנֵי קַצְרָה שֶׁלְצִיפּוֹרִין לְכַבּוֹתוֹ וְלֹא הִנִּיחַ לָהֶן. אָמַר. הַנִּיחוֹ לַגַּבַּאי שֶׁיִּגְבֶּה אֶת חוֹבוֹ. מִיַּד קָשַׁר עַלָיו הֶעָנָן וְכִיבָּהוּ. וּבְמוֹצָאֵי שַׁבָּת שָׁלַח לְכָל אֶחַד וְאֶחָד מֵהֶן סֶלַע. וּלְאִיפַּרְכוֹס שֶׁלָּהֶן חֲמִשִּׁים דֵּינָר. אָמְרוּ חֲכָמִים. לֹא הָיָה צָרִיךְ לַעֲשׂוֹת כֵּן. חַד נַפְּתַּיי הֲוָה מֵגִירֵיהּ דְּרִבִּי יוֹנָה. נָפְלַת דְלֵיקָתָא בִּמִגִירוּתֵיהּ דְּרִבִּי יוֹנָה. אֲזַל הַהוּא נַפְּתַּיָיא בְעֵי מִטְפַּתָּהּ. וְלָא שָׁבְקֵיהּ רִבִּי יוֹנָה. אֲמַר לֵיהּ. בַּגְרָךְ מִדְּלִי. אֲמַר לֵיהּ אִין. וְאִישְׁתְּזִיב כּוּלַּהּ. רִבִּי יוּדָן דִּכָפַר אִמִּי פָּרַס גּוּלְתֵּיהּ עַל גָּדִישָׁא דְנוּרָא. עָרְקָה מִינֵּיהּ.

From where that any uncertainty of a danger to life pushes the Sabbath aside? Rebbi Abbahu in the name of Rebbi Joḥanan: Only you shall keep My Sabbaths; a diminution. Some want to say, the Torah said, desecrate the Sabbath for him, so he will dwell and keep many Sabbaths. Rebbi Zeˋira, Rebbi Ḥiyya in the name of Rebbi Joḥanan: If a wall collapsed in a dead-end street populated by Gentiles, but where one Jew lived, one digs there because of the Jew. How far? Two Amoraim. One said, up to his nose; the other said, up to his navel. He who said, up to his nose, about one who was healthy; he who said up to his navel, about one who was intoxicated. It was stated: (The one who decided is praiseworthy, one who is asked has to be ready,) [the one who is quick is praiseworthy, the one who is asked is blameworthy,] and the one who asks is a spiller of blood. It was stated: In any case of danger to life one does not say that the work be done by Gentiles or minors, but even by adult Jewish persons. “It happened that there was a fire in the courtyard of Yose ben Simai in Shihin, and the garrison of the barracks of Sepphoris came to fight it but he did not let them fight it; he said, let the collector collect his due. Immediately there formed a cloud which extinguished it. After the Sabbath he sent to each of them a tetradrachma and to their commander 50 denarii.” The Sages said, there was no need for him to do that. A Nabatean was a neighbor of Rebbi Jonah. There was a fire in Rebbi Jonah’s neighborhood; the Nabatean wanted to fight it but Rebbi Jonah did not let him. He said to him, because of my property! He said, yes. And everything was saved. Rebbi Jonah from Kefar-Immi spread his garment over the burning grain stack and the fire retreated from it.

רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן, הַאי ״וְחֵי אָחִיךָ עִמָּךְ״ מַאי עָבֵיד לֵיהּ? מִבְּעֵי לֵיהּ לְכִדְתַנְיָא: שְׁנַיִם שֶׁהָיוּ מְהַלְּכִין בַּדֶּרֶךְ וּבְיַד אֶחָד מֵהֶן קִיתוֹן שֶׁל מַיִם, אִם שׁוֹתִין שְׁנֵיהֶם – מֵתִים. וְאִם שׁוֹתֶה אֶחָד מֵהֶן – מַגִּיעַ לַיִּשּׁוּב. דָּרַשׁ בֶּן פְּטוֹרָא: מוּטָב שֶׁיִּשְׁתּוּ שְׁנֵיהֶם וְיָמוּתוּ, וְאַל יִרְאֶה אֶחָד מֵהֶם בְּמִיתָתוֹ שֶׁל חֲבֵירוֹ. עַד שֶׁבָּא רַבִּי עֲקִיבָא וְלִימֵּד: ״וְחֵי אָחִיךָ עִמָּךְ״, חַיֶּיךָ קוֹדְמִים לְחַיֵּי חֲבֵירֶךָ.

The Gemara asks: And Rabbi Yoḥanan, what does he do with this verse: “And your brother shall live with you”? The Gemara answers: He requires the verse for that which is taught in a baraita: If two people were walking on a desolate path and there was a jug [kiton] of water in the possession of one of them, and the situation was such that if both drink from the jug, both will die, as there is not enough water, but if only one of them drinks, he will reach a settled area, there is a dispute as to the halakha. Ben Petora taught: It is preferable that both of them drink and die, and let neither one of them see the death of the other. This was the accepted opinion until Rabbi Akiva came and taught that the verse states: “And your brother shall live with you,” indicating that your life takes precedence over the life of the other.

תא’ תקפב מַה שֶּׁכָּתַב הָרַב זִכְרוֹנוֹ לִבְרָכָה כָּל הַיָּכוֹל לְהַצִּיל וְכוּלֵי אָיְירֵי בְּמִי שֶׁיָּכוֹל לְהַצִּיל לְהֶדְיָא בְּלֹא שֶׁיִּסְתַּכֵּן הַמַּצִּיל כְּלָל כְּגוֹן שֶׁהָיָה יָשֵׁן תַּחַת כּוֹתֶל רָעוּעַ שֶׁהָיָה יָכוֹל לַהֲעִירוֹ מִשְּׁנָתוֹ וְלֹא הֱעִירוֹ אוֹ כְּגוֹן שֶׁיּוֹדֵעַ לוֹ עֵדוּת לַהֲצִילוֹ עָבַר עַל לֹא תַעֲמֹד עַל דַּם רֵעֶךָ. וְלֹא זֹו בִלְבַד אֶלָּא אֲפִילוּ יֵשׁ בּוֹ קְצָת סָפֵק סַכָּנָה כְּגוֹן רָאָה אוֹתוֹ טוֹבֵעַ בַּיָּם אֹו לִסְטִים בָּאִים עָלָיו אוֹ חַיָּה רָעָה שֶׁיֵּשׁ בְּכָל אֵלּוּ סָפֵק סַכָּנָה אֲפִלּוּ הָכֵי חַיָּיב לְהַצִּיל וַאֲפִילוּ שֶּׁלֹּא הָיָה יָכוֹל לְהַצִּיל בְּגוּפוֹ לֹא נִפְטַר בִּשְׁבִיל כָּךְ אֶלָּא חַיָּיב לְהַצִּיל בְּמָמוֹנוֹ…מִכָּל מָקוֹם אִם הַסָּפֵק נוֹטֶה אֶל הַוַּדַּאי אֵינוֹ חַיָּיב לִמְסוֹר עַצְמוֹ לְהַצִּיל אֶת חֲבֵירוֹ וַאֲפִילוּ בְסָפֵק מוּכְרָע אֵינוֹ חַיָּיב לִמְסוֹר נַפְשׁוֹ דְּמַאי חֲזֵית דִּדְּמָא דִּידָךְ סוּמָק טְפֵי דִּילְמָא דְּמָא דִּידֵיהּ סוּמָק טְפֵי אֲבָל אִם הַסָּפֵק אֵינוֹ מוּכְרָע אֶלָּא נוֹטֶה אֶל הַהֲצָלָה וְהוּא לֹא יִסְתַּכֵּן וְלֹא הִצִּיל עָבַר עַל לֹא תַעֲמֹד עַל דַּם רֵעֶךָ.

Regarding the statement of the Rabbi (Rambam) of blessed memory, "Anyone who is able to rescue..." this refers to one who can be clearly rescued without the rescuer endangering himself in any way, such as one who is asleep under an unsteady wall who the would-be rescuer is able to wake him from his sleep but does not wake him, or one who knows of evidence to exonerate him (i.e., the other. E.g., from capital punishment and fails to come forward), he transgresses the prohibition of “Do not stand idly by the blood of your brother.” Not only in this case, but even if [in saving him] there is a potential small risk of danger, such as the case when he sees him drowning, or bandits attacking, or wild animals [threatening] – for there exists in all of these cases a risk of danger, he is still obligated to rescue, and even if he cannot do it himself, he is not exempt for this reason, but is obligated to use his own finances [to save the victim]...Nevertheless, if the potential risk inclines toward certainty, he is not obligated to sacrifice himself to save his fellow.

  1. Rabbi J. David Bleich, Contemporary Halakhic Problems, Vol II, Part II, Chapter X, Entebbe 6: "The question of whether or not one must risk one's life in order to save the life of another is the subject of considerable disagreement. R. Joseph Karo, Kesef Mishneh, Hilkhot Rozeaḥ 1:14, and Bet Yosef, Hoshen Mishpat 426, cites Hagahot Maimuniyot who, in turn, bases himself upon a statement found in the Palestinian Talmud and declares that one is indeed obligated to assume such a risk. Bet Yosef explains that if the impending loss of life is certain, while the danger to the would-be rescuer is doubtful, the "certainty" of one's fellow takes precedence over the "doubtful" loss of one's own life. On the other hand, Issur ve-Hetter 59:38 declares that no person is obligated to place himself at risk in order to save the life of another. Sema, Hoshen Mishpat 426:2, notes that no such obligation is recorded by any early authority. A similar ruling was issued by R. David ibn Zimra, Teshuvot Radbaz, III, no. 625. The question submitted to Radbaz involved a situation in which a feudal despot demanded of a Jew that he permit one of his limbs to be cut off and threatened that, should permission to do so not be forthcoming, a fellow Jew would be put to death. Radbaz answered2This is in opposition to the view of Teshuvot Maharam Recanati, no. 480. that compliance with this cruel request would constitute an act of piety, but that there exists no obligation to do so, particularly since the amputation of a limb may lead to death. In situations where there exists a significant hazard to the life of the would-be rescuer, Radbaz speaks of one who assumes such risk as a "pious fool." In such cases the applicable consideration is, "How do you know that the blood of your fellow is sweeter than your blood?" a variation of the talmudic dictum which prohibits the taking of the life of one's fellow in order to save one's own life."
  2. Rabbi J. David Bleich, Contemporary Halakhic Problems, Vol II, Part II, Chapter X, Entebbe 6: "In situations where there exists a significant hazard to the life of the would-be rescuer, Radbaz speaks of one who assumes such risk as a "pious fool." In such cases the applicable consideration is, "How do you know that the blood of your fellow is sweeter than your blood?" a variation of the talmudic dictum which prohibits the taking of the life of one's fellow in order to save one's own life."