King Saul and King David - two sins, but two very different outcomes[Sefer Ha-Ikarrim 4:26]
King Saul and Amalek
(י) וַֽיְהִי֙ דְּבַר־יְהֹוָ֔ה אֶל־שְׁמוּאֵ֖ל לֵאמֹֽר׃ (יא) נִחַ֗מְתִּי כִּֽי־הִמְלַ֤כְתִּי אֶת־שָׁאוּל֙ לְמֶ֔לֶךְ כִּי־שָׁב֙ מֵֽאַחֲרַ֔י וְאֶת־דְּבָרַ֖י לֹ֣א הֵקִ֑ים וַיִּ֙חַר֙ לִשְׁמוּאֵ֔ל וַיִּזְעַ֥ק אֶל־יְהֹוָ֖ה כׇּל־הַלָּֽיְלָה׃ (יב) וַיַּשְׁכֵּ֧ם שְׁמוּאֵ֛ל לִקְרַ֥את שָׁא֖וּל בַּבֹּ֑קֶר וַיֻּגַּ֨ד לִשְׁמוּאֵ֜ל לֵאמֹ֗ר בָּֽא־שָׁא֤וּל הַכַּרְמֶ֙לָה֙ וְהִנֵּ֨ה מַצִּ֥יב לוֹ֙ יָ֔ד וַיִּסֹּב֙ וַֽיַּעֲבֹ֔ר וַיֵּ֖רֶד הַגִּלְגָּֽל׃ (יג) וַיָּבֹ֥א שְׁמוּאֵ֖ל אֶל־שָׁא֑וּל וַיֹּ֧אמֶר ל֣וֹ שָׁא֗וּל בָּר֤וּךְ אַתָּה֙ לַֽיהֹוָ֔ה הֲקִימֹ֖תִי אֶת־דְּבַ֥ר יְהֹוָֽה׃ (יד) וַיֹּ֣אמֶר שְׁמוּאֵ֔ל וּמֶ֛ה קֽוֹל־הַצֹּ֥אן הַזֶּ֖ה בְּאׇזְנָ֑י וְק֣וֹל הַבָּקָ֔ר אֲשֶׁ֥ר אָנֹכִ֖י שֹׁמֵֽעַ׃ (טו) וַיֹּ֨אמֶר שָׁא֜וּל מֵעֲמָלֵקִ֣י הֱבִיא֗וּם אֲשֶׁ֨ר חָמַ֤ל הָעָם֙ עַל־מֵיטַ֤ב הַצֹּאן֙ וְהַבָּקָ֔ר לְמַ֥עַן זְבֹ֖חַ לַיהֹוָ֣ה אֱלֹהֶ֑יךָ וְאֶת־הַיּוֹתֵ֖ר הֶחֱרַֽמְנוּ׃ {פ}
King David and Bathsheba
Joseph Albo’s question:
Why was Saul punished for his sin by having the kingdom taken away from him, and not in some other way, when David, though punished for the Bathsheba affair, maintained his kingdom?
Albo’s first suggested answer: Repentance
The elements of repentance by which a person may be cleansed of his iniquities and purified of his sin before God are as follows:
- He should feel regret on account of his sins.
- He should confess his transgressions.
- He should commit to not repeating the sin again, demonstrating that it was done unintentionally and in error.
David’s repentance [Psalm 51]
(1) For the leader. A psalm of David, (2) when Nathan the prophet came to him after he had come to Bathsheba.
(3) Have mercy upon me, O God,
as befits Your faithfulness;
in keeping with Your abundant compassion,
blot out my transgressions. (4) Wash me thoroughly of my iniquity,
and purify me of my sin; (5) for I recognize my transgressions,
and am ever conscious of my sin. (6) Against You alone have I sinned,
and done what is evil in Your sight;
so You are just in Your sentence,
and right in Your judgment. (7) Indeed I was born with iniquity;
with sin my mother conceived me. (8) Indeed You desire truth about that which is hidden;
teach me wisdom about secret things.-b
(9) Purge me with hyssop till I am pure;
wash me till I am whiter than snow. (10) Let me hear tidings of joy and gladness;
let the bones You have crushed exult. (11) Hide Your face from my sins;
blot out all my iniquities. (12) Fashion a pure heart for me, O God;
create in me a steadfast spirit. (13) Do not cast me out of Your presence,
or take Your holy spirit away from me. (14) Let me again rejoice in Your help;
let a vigorous spirit sustain me. (15) I will teach transgressors Your ways,
that sinners may return to You.
(16) Save me from bloodguilt,
O God, God, my deliverer,
that I may sing forth Your beneficence. (17) O Lord, open my lips,
and let my mouth declare Your praise. (18) You do not want me to bring sacrifices;
You do not desire burnt offerings; (19) True sacrifice to God is a contrite spirit;
God, You will not despise
a contrite and crushed heart.
(20) May it please You to make Zion prosper;
rebuild the walls of Jerusalem. (21) Then You will want sacrifices offered in righteousness,
burnt and whole offerings;
then bulls will be offered on Your altar.
ALBO: David’s repentance in relation to Bathsheba was sincere:
He felt regret by saying, "Have mercy upon me, O God, as befits Your faithfulness; in keeping with Your abundant compassion, blot out my transgressions. Wash me thoroughly of my iniquity, and purify me of my sin."
He confessed by saying, "for I recognise my transgressions, and am ever conscious of my sin. Against You alone have I sinned, and done what is evil in Your sight, Hide Your face from my sins; blot out all my iniquities. Fashion a pure heart for me, O God; create in me a steadfast spirit."
He committed to never repeating the sin again by saying, “I will teach transgressors Your ways, that sinners may return to You."
What hinders repentance?
ALBO: Three things hinder and prevent repentance:
Firstly, ignorance of having committed a sin: If one doesn’t recognise or know that he has sinned, he will never regret doing the thing he does, nor repent.
Secondly, excusing oneself: For if a man thinks that excusing himself for his sin will avail him, he will never regret the doing of it, nor confess his sin.
Thirdly, the love of money and glory: For if a person repents in order to get some financial benefit or honour, his act is not repentance at all.
Saul’s repentance
(19) Why did you disobey the LORD and swoop down on the spoil in defiance of the LORD’s will?”-d (20) Saul said to Samuel, “But I did obey the LORD! I performed the mission on which the LORD sent me: I captured King Agag of Amalek, and I proscribed Amalek, (21) and the troops took from the spoil some sheep and oxen—the best of what had been proscribed—to sacrifice to the LORD your God at Gilgal.” (22) But Samuel said:
“Does the LORD delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices
As much as in obedience to the LORD’s command?
Surely, obedience is better than sacrifice,
Compliance than the fat of rams. (23) For rebellion is like the sin of divination,
Defiance, like the iniquity of teraphim.
Because you rejected the LORD’s command,
He has rejected you as king.” (24) Saul said to Samuel, “I did wrong to transgress the LORD’s command and your instructions; but I was afraid of the troops and I yielded to them. (25) Please, forgive my offense and come back with me, and I will bow low to the LORD.” (26) But Samuel said to Saul, “I will not go back with you; for you have rejected the LORD’s command, and the LORD has rejected you as king over Israel.” (27) As Samuel turned to leave, Saul seized the corner of his robe, and it tore. (28) And Samuel said to him, “The LORD has this day torn the kingship over Israel away from you and has given it to another who is worthier than you. (29) Moreover, the Glory of Israel does not deceive or change His mind, for He is not human that He should change His mind.” (30) But [Saul] pleaded, “I did wrong. Please, honor me in the presence of the elders of my people and in the presence of Israel, and come back with me until I have bowed low to the LORD your God.”
ALBO: Saul’s repentance was insincere:
Firstly, he expressed ignorance rather than regret, by denying and not even recognising that he sinned, saying in response to Samuel’s admonition, “But I did obey the LORD! I performed the mission on which the LORD sent me" [and then when further remonstrated with goes on to say,] "I captured King Agag of Amalek, and I proscribed Amalek"
He then excused himself rather than confessed his sin, and only admitted he had sinned when Samuel informed him that his obstinacy was worse than his disobedience. And Saul said unto Samuel: “I did wrong to transgress the LORD’s command and your instructions;" [but then goes on to blame his soldiers] "I was afraid of the troops and I yielded to them."
The love of money and glory: Eventually, Saul admitted that he had sinned, but showed that this was for the sake of receiving honour and not for the love of God, when he says,“I did wrong. Please, honor me in the presence of the elders of my people and in the presence of Israel, and come back with me until I have bowed low to the LORD your God.”
As a result of the above, Saul’s repentance was not accepted, and Samuel was told at once to anoint David as king.
Albo’s second suggested answer: The qualities of a king
ALBO says that others have suggested that Saul committed a misdeed in relation to his kingship, which he doesn’t necessary share, but nonetheless amends this explanation to fit in with his own.
The qualities of a king
ALBO: The main purpose of having a king is to fight the enemy and to judge the people justly. When Israel demanded a king, they said: “That our king may judge us, and go out before us, and fight our battles.” [I Samuel 8:20], but there are a further six qualities.
One: The king must be merciful to his own people and willing to give his life to save them.
Two: The king must be good to those who are good to him, to his servants and those who fight his battles, for if he won’t do this, who will risk his life for the king’s glory and who will take his part against those who are treacherous?
Three: The king should hate unlawful gain and not be covetous. The Torah says: “Neither shall he greatly multiply to himself silver and gold,” [Deuteronomy 17:17] for if he takes pains to gather silver and gold, even though it be from the enemy, he will take from his own people if he cannot find it among the enemy.
Four: The king should be someone of valour, strong and mighty to “break the jaws of the unrighteous.”[Job 29:17]. He must not respect the faces of the poor, nor honour the faces of the great, nor fear to do justice.
Five: The king should speak the truth, and he should judge righteously, for the man who lies or speaks falsehoods, does so either from fear or because he cannot obtain his desire without it, but the judge must not be afraid of any man [Deuteronomy 1:17]. No one will trust the words of the king if he speaks falsely.
Six: The king should fear God. He should be submissive to those who serve God and observe those commandments which he was given in the capacity of king or after he became king. And in regard to the other commandments, too, he must not consider himself as superior to his brethren and think he is free from the commandments any more than they are [for] if, the people see the king disregarding the law and the teachers thereof, they will all come to ignore it, and the whole Torah will fall.
Saul was a failure as king
ALBO: Now if we examine Saul’s qualities, we find that he was lacking in all of them.
One: He spared Agag [when instructed not to].
Two: He did not treat David kindly, who risked his life when he slew Goliath.
Three: He took the spoils of battle for his own ends.
Four: He let the tail wag the dog by following the wishes of the masses, whereas David did what was right.
Five: He lied to Samuel to cover up his transgressions, whereas David confessed to his sin with Bathsheba to Nathan the prophet.
Six: He ignored Samuel and violated the specific commands which were given to him, whereas David obeyed all the commands of Nathan the prophet, Gad the seer, and Samuel.
David, unlike Saul, was perfect in all these qualities. This was why God saw to it that the kingdom did not remain with Saul and why Saul left no descendants worthy of the kingship.
But why was Saul punished by losing his kingdom whilst David kept his?
ALBO asks: why was Saul punished for his sin by having the kingdom taken away from him, and not in some other way, as David was punished for the Bathsheba affair, without losing his kingdom?
[Using an analogy, he says] It is like the case of two scribes of whom one is found guilty of forging a document and the other of an incestuous marriage.
When the king administers to each of them the punishment that befits the crime, punishing with stripes the one guilty of incest, there is no reason why he should lose his position, and he therefore retains his position as before. The scribe, on the other hand, who forged a document, in addition to being punished for his crime, deserves to be removed from his position and not to be trusted with such an office.
In the same way, David’s sin was not in regard to a specific commandment which was given to him after he was king, or a specific command given in the Torah which concerned his position as king. [Instead] his sin concerned a commandment which he had in common with all men, for the prohibition of adultery or homicide is common to all men. Therefore, it was fitting that his punishment should be like that given to the generality of men.
Saul, on the other hand, sinned in reference to a specific command given to him by Samuel after he was king, or given to him because he was king, specifically not to spare Amalek and he did not execute proper vengeance on Amalek, the command of which he chose to ignore. And it is for this reason, he was punished by him [and his descendants] by losing his kingship, and by dying prematurely...
Returning to Albo's question:
Why was Saul punished for his sin by having the kingdom taken away from him, and not in some other way, when David, though punished for the Bathsheba affair, maintained his kingdom?
Both King Saul and King David sinned. Saul by failing to follow God’s instructions to wipe out Amalek by sparing Agag and taking the spoils, David by having an adulterous affair with Bathsheba who he got pregnant and then sent her husband into battle to get him killed in order to marry her.
However, Saul pays the ultimate price, both by losing his kingdom and eventually his life, despite committing just one sin, whilst David who committed two sins, retains his position.
Two potential reasons are given.
The first is that Saul not only sinned by ignoring a direct commandment from God, but he compounded his sin by
- not only denying it when confronted by Samuel, but
- then seeks to justify his actions by blaming his actions on his soldiers, so avoids taking responsibility, and
- he then grudgingly apologises but does so for the sake of receiving honour and not for the love of God, and so fails to do any teshuva.
David, by contrast, didn’t ignore any direct commandment from God, but only sinned as per the way of man, for which he did full teshuva, i.e., he recognised his wrongdoing, confessed, and committed never to do it again.
The second reason is to do with the fact that Saul failed in matters of state and the nature of his role as king, whilst David fulfilled his responsibilities in this area.
So, what are the poential lessons for today's political leaders?
Albo would perhaps suggest that if the failure is to do with misdemeanours in one’s personal life, then that in itself is not necessarily deemed to be a reason to lose office if one apologises. But, if there is no apology or recognition of any offence then they should resign or be removed from office.
However, if it is one that is to do directly with a failing of the expected responsibilities of a political leader then no apology can suffice, and they should resign or be removed.

