https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/protocol-additional-geneva-conventions-12-august-1949-and-0

In this final book of the Torah, if we are honest readers who intend to wrestle forthrightly with the text, we encounter clear and troubling contradictions that can challenge our ideas about ethics, about the ethics that arise from the Torah.
For example: the valuing of life, pikuach nefesh, which is often said to be one of the most fundamental of Jewish values.... in Parashat Shoftim, as elsewhere in Deuteronomy, we are faced with verses that tell us that the lives of humans who are not Jewish are to be destroyed, and thus we infer that these lives are not equivalent to Jewish lives.
(י) כִּֽי־תִקְרַ֣ב אֶל־עִ֔יר לְהִלָּחֵ֖ם עָלֶ֑יהָ וְקָרָ֥אתָ אֵלֶ֖יהָ לְשָׁלֽוֹם׃ (יא) וְהָיָה֙ אִם־שָׁל֣וֹם תַּֽעַנְךָ֔ וּפָתְחָ֖ה לָ֑ךְ וְהָיָ֞ה כׇּל־הָעָ֣ם הַנִּמְצָא־בָ֗הּ יִהְי֥וּ לְךָ֛ לָמַ֖ס וַעֲבָדֽוּךָ׃ (יב) וְאִם־לֹ֤א תַשְׁלִים֙ עִמָּ֔ךְ וְעָשְׂתָ֥ה עִמְּךָ֖ מִלְחָמָ֑ה וְצַרְתָּ֖ עָלֶֽיהָ׃ (יג) וּנְתָנָ֛הּ ה׳ אֱלֹקֶ֖יךָ בְּיָדֶ֑ךָ וְהִכִּיתָ֥ אֶת־כׇּל־זְכוּרָ֖הּ לְפִי־חָֽרֶב׃ (יד) רַ֣ק הַ֠נָּשִׁ֠ים וְהַטַּ֨ף וְהַבְּהֵמָ֜ה וְכֹל֩ אֲשֶׁ֨ר יִהְיֶ֥ה בָעִ֛יר כׇּל־שְׁלָלָ֖הּ תָּבֹ֣ז לָ֑ךְ וְאָֽכַלְתָּ֙ אֶת־שְׁלַ֣ל אֹיְבֶ֔יךָ אֲשֶׁ֥ר נָתַ֛ן ה׳ אֱלֹקֶ֖יךָ לָֽךְ׃
(10) When you approach a town to attack it, you shall offer it terms of peace. (11) If it responds peaceably and lets you in, all the people present there shall serve you at forced labor. (12) If it does not surrender to you, but would join battle with you, you shall lay siege to it; (13) and when your God ה׳ delivers it into your hand, you shall put all its males to the sword.(14) You may, however, take as your booty the women, the children, the livestock, and everything in the town—all its spoil—and enjoy the use of the spoil of your enemy, which your God ה׳ gives you.
(טז) רַ֗ק מֵעָרֵ֤י הָֽעַמִּים֙ הָאֵ֔לֶּה אֲשֶׁר֙ ה׳ אֱלֹקֶ֔יךָ נֹתֵ֥ן לְךָ֖ נַחֲלָ֑ה לֹ֥א תְחַיֶּ֖ה כׇּל־נְשָׁמָֽה׃
(16) In the towns of the latter peoples, however, which your God ה׳ is giving you as a heritage, you shall not let a soul remain alive.
The closing section of this parsha clearly brings forward the notion that Jewish lives hold an entirely different value than the lives of others. This is the interlude that's referred to as the "eglah arufah" - decapitated calf. It is a brief section, Deuteronomy 21:1-9, only nine verses. We read the rules for dealing with the discovery of a [presumably Jewish corpse] in open land, between two cities; the cause of death is presumed to be murder, and the murderer is unknown and (presumably) undiscoverable.
(א) כִּי־יִמָּצֵ֣א חָלָ֗ל בָּאֲדָמָה֙ אֲשֶׁר֩ ה׳ אֱלֹקֶ֜יךָ נֹתֵ֤ן לְךָ֙ לְרִשְׁתָּ֔הּ נֹפֵ֖ל בַּשָּׂדֶ֑ה לֹ֥א נוֹדַ֖ע מִ֥י הִכָּֽהוּ׃ (ב) וְיָצְא֥וּ זְקֵנֶ֖יךָ וְשֹׁפְטֶ֑יךָ וּמָדְדוּ֙ אֶל־הֶ֣עָרִ֔ים אֲשֶׁ֖ר סְבִיבֹ֥ת הֶחָלָֽל׃ (ג) וְהָיָ֣ה הָעִ֔יר הַקְּרֹבָ֖ה אֶל־הֶחָלָ֑ל וְלָֽקְח֡וּ זִקְנֵי֩ הָעִ֨יר הַהִ֜וא עֶגְלַ֣ת בָּקָ֗ר אֲשֶׁ֤ר לֹֽא־עֻבַּד֙ בָּ֔הּ אֲשֶׁ֥ר לֹא־מָשְׁכָ֖ה בְּעֹֽל׃ (ד) וְהוֹרִ֡דוּ זִקְנֵי֩ הָעִ֨יר הַהִ֤וא אֶת־הָֽעֶגְלָה֙ אֶל־נַ֣חַל אֵיתָ֔ן אֲשֶׁ֛ר לֹא־יֵעָבֵ֥ד בּ֖וֹ וְלֹ֣א יִזָּרֵ֑עַ וְעָֽרְפוּ־שָׁ֥ם אֶת־הָעֶגְלָ֖ה בַּנָּֽחַל׃ (ה) וְנִגְּשׁ֣וּ הַכֹּהֲנִים֮ בְּנֵ֣י לֵוִי֒ כִּ֣י בָ֗ם בָּחַ֞ר ה׳ אֱלֹקֶ֙יךָ֙ לְשָׁ֣רְת֔וֹ וּלְבָרֵ֖ךְ בְּשֵׁ֣ם ה׳ וְעַל־פִּיהֶ֥ם יִהְיֶ֖ה כׇּל־רִ֥יב וְכׇל־נָֽגַע׃ (ו) וְכֹ֗ל זִקְנֵי֙ הָעִ֣יר הַהִ֔וא הַקְּרֹבִ֖ים אֶל־הֶחָלָ֑ל יִרְחֲצוּ֙ אֶת־יְדֵיהֶ֔ם עַל־הָעֶגְלָ֖ה הָעֲרוּפָ֥ה בַנָּֽחַל׃ (ז) וְעָנ֖וּ וְאָמְר֑וּ יָדֵ֗ינוּ לֹ֤א (שפכה)[שָֽׁפְכוּ֙] אֶת־הַדָּ֣ם הַזֶּ֔ה וְעֵינֵ֖ינוּ לֹ֥א רָאֽוּ׃ (ח) כַּפֵּר֩ לְעַמְּךָ֨ יִשְׂרָאֵ֤ל אֲשֶׁר־פָּדִ֙יתָ֙ ה׳ וְאַל־תִּתֵּן֙ דָּ֣ם נָקִ֔י בְּקֶ֖רֶב עַמְּךָ֣ יִשְׂרָאֵ֑ל וְנִכַּפֵּ֥ר לָהֶ֖ם הַדָּֽם׃ (ט) וְאַתָּ֗ה תְּבַעֵ֛ר הַדָּ֥ם הַנָּקִ֖י מִקִּרְבֶּ֑ךָ כִּֽי־תַעֲשֶׂ֥ה הַיָּשָׁ֖ר בְּעֵינֵ֥י ה׳׃ {ס}
(1) If, in the land that your God ה׳ is assigning you to possess, someone slain is found lying in the open, the identity of the slayer not being known, (2) your elders and magistrates shall go out and measure the distances from the corpse to the nearby towns. (3) The elders of the town nearest to the corpse shall then take a heifer which has never been worked, which has never pulled in a yoke; (4) and the elders of that town shall bring the heifer down to an everflowing wadi, which is not tilled or sown. There, in the wadi, they shall break the heifer’s neck. (5) The priests, sons of Levi, shall come forward; for your God ה׳ has chosen them for divine service and to pronounce blessing in the name of ה׳, and every lawsuit and case of assault is subject to their ruling. (6) Then all the elders of the town nearest to the corpse shall wash their hands over the heifer whose neck was broken in the wadi. (7) And they shall make this declaration: “Our hands did not shed this blood, nor did our eyes see it done. (8) Absolve, ה׳, Your people Israel whom You redeemed, and do not let guilt for the blood of the innocent remain among Your people Israel.” And they will be absolved of bloodguilt. (9) Thus you will remove from your midst guilt for the blood of the innocent, for you will be doing what is right in the sight of ה׳.
As many commentators have pointed out, this fairly brief interlude is placed between two sets of rules for "when you go out to war" (here in Parashat Shoftim and immediately following these verses, at the start of Parashat Ki Teitzei).
"IntroductionThe final section of our parsha discusses the mitzvah of eglah arufah – the decapitated calf. As the verses describe, if a person should be found slain and the identity of his killer is unknown, the elders of the city closest to where the victim was found bring a calf down to a valley and decapitate it there. They then declare that they had no part in the death of this victim and ask for atonement for the people of Israel. However we understand the procedure and details of this mitzvah, the underlying message is that a tragedy of this sort cannot be allowed to pass without response from those nearby – even if it was in no way of their doing. Although the identity of the killer is unknown, and that of the victim perhaps equally so, a fellow Jew’s life has been cut short and that loss needs to be felt and addressed.
https://outorah.org/p/88815/
(ט) וְאַתָּ֗ה תְּבַעֵ֛ר הַדָּ֥ם הַנָּקִ֖י מִקִּרְבֶּ֑ךָ כִּֽי־תַעֲשֶׂ֥ה הַיָּשָׁ֖ר בְּעֵינֵ֥י ה׳׃ {ס}
(9) Thus you will remove from your midst guilt for the blood of the innocent, for you will be doing what is right in the sight of ה׳.
As we enter Elul 5785, as we have very recently received the formal declaration from the United Nations that there is a famine in Gaza, as the lives of dozens if not hundreds of Palestinians are ended every day by Israeli actions in Gaza and the West Bank, it is more than urgent for us to interrogate the idea that Jewish lives somehow have more value than others' lives.
Contemporary "rules of war", more formally known as "International Humanitarian Law" (IHL), were set out in the Geneva Conventions of 1949, to which 196 countries are signatories (including the United States and Israel). These rules intend to lessen the suffering and destruction caused by armed conflict, and to delineate protections for civilians and armed combatants alike. Serious violations of international humanitarian law are considered war crimes.
From The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts.Part IV: CIVILIAN POPULATION
Article 13 - Protection of the civilian population
1. The civilian population and individual civilians shall enjoy general protection against the dangers arising from military operations. To give effect to this protection, the following rules shall be observed in all circumstances.
2. The civilian population as such, as well as individual civilians, shall not be the object of attack. Acts or threats of violence the primary purpose of which is to spread terror among the civilian population are prohibited.
3. Civilians shall enjoy the protection afforded by this Part, unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities.
https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/protocol-additional-geneva-conventions-12-august-1949-and-0
What about elements of life that are indispensable to survival?
(יט) כִּֽי־תָצ֣וּר אֶל־עִיר֩ יָמִ֨ים רַבִּ֜ים לְֽהִלָּחֵ֧ם עָלֶ֣יהָ לְתׇפְשָׂ֗הּ לֹֽא־תַשְׁחִ֤ית אֶת־עֵצָהּ֙ לִנְדֹּ֤חַ עָלָיו֙ גַּרְזֶ֔ן כִּ֚י מִמֶּ֣נּוּ תֹאכֵ֔ל וְאֹת֖וֹ לֹ֣א תִכְרֹ֑ת כִּ֤י הָֽאָדָם֙ עֵ֣ץ הַשָּׂדֶ֔ה לָבֹ֥א מִפָּנֶ֖יךָ בַּמָּצֽוֹר׃
(19) When in your war against a city you have to besiege it a long time in order to capture it, you must not destroy its trees, wielding the ax against them. You may eat of them, but you must not cut them down. Are trees of the field human to withdraw before you into the besieged city?
Starvation of civilians as a method of combat is prohibited. It is therefore prohibited to attack, destroy, remove or render useless, for that purpose, objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population, such as foodstuffs, agricultural areas for the production of foodstuffs, crops, livestock, drinking water installations and supplies and irrigation works. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/protocol-additional-geneva-conventions-12-august-1949-and-0
In today's world, there is a formal international collective intention to preserve life. The United States and Israel, along with 194 other countries, are signatories to the Geneva Convention.
Please see also my commentary on Parashat Shoftim from last year, "Shoftim 5784: The Narrow Place of a Siege" for more considerations about sieges and starvation:
Shoftim 5784 - The Narrow Place of a Siege | Sefaria
In fact, other translations of Deuteronomy 20:19 bring forward the metaphor of a human person as a "tree of the field":
Metsudah Chumash, 2009:
When thou shalt besiege a city a long time, in making waragainst it to take it, thou shalt not destroy the trees thereofby forcing an axe against them: for thou mayest eat of them, andthou shalt not cut them down (for the tree of the field is man'slife) to employ them in the siege.
Interesting to compare the King James Version:
When thou shalt besiege a city a long time, in making waragainst it to take it, thou shalt not destroy the trees thereofby forcing an axe against them: for thou mayest eat of them, andthou shalt not cut them down (for the tree of the field is man's life) to employ them in the siege.
אֲמַר לֵיהּ רַבִּי יִרְמְיָהלְרַבִּי זֵירָא: לֵיתֵי מָר לִיתְנֵי. אֲמַר לֵיהּ: חֲלַשׁ לִבַּאי וְלָא יָכֵילְנָא. לֵימָא מָר מִילְּתָא דְּאַגַּדְתָּא, אֲמַר לֵיהּ: הָכִי אָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן — מַאי דִּכְתִיב: ״כִּי הָאָדָם עֵץ הַשָּׂדֶה״, וְכִי אָדָם עֵץ שָׂדֶה הוּא?
Rabbi Yirmeya once said to Rabbi Zeira: Let the Master come and teach a halakhic discourse. Rabbi Zeirasaid to him: My heart is weak and I cannot strain myself over a halakhic discourse. Rabbi Yirmeya replied to him: In that case, let the Master tell us a matter of aggada, which does not require as much effort. Rabbi Zeirasaid to him that Rabbi Yoḥanan said as follows: What is the meaning of that which is written: “For man is a tree of the field” (Deuteronomy 20:19)? And is man actually a tree of the field?
And Abaye said to Rabba: In breaking the bench, didn’t the Master violate the prohibition, “Do not destroy” (Deuteronomy 20:19)? It is prohibited to destroy objects of value. Rabbasaid to him: Do not destroy also with regard to destruction of my body. Preventing illness and danger is preferable to me.
אֵין קוֹצְצִין אִילָנֵי מַאֲכָל שֶׁחוּץ לַמְּדִינָה וְאֵין מוֹנְעִין מֵהֶם אַמַּת הַמַּיִם כְּדֵי שֶׁיִּיבְשׁוּ. שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (דברים כ, יט) "לֹא תַשְׁחִית אֶת עֵצָהּ". וְכָל הַקּוֹצֵץ לוֹקֶה. וְלֹא בְּמָצוֹר בִּלְבַד אֶלָּא בְּכָל מָקוֹם כָּל הַקּוֹצֵץ אִילַן מַאֲכָל דֶּרֶךְ הַשְׁחָתָה לוֹקֶה. אֲבָל קוֹצְצִין אוֹתוֹ אִם הָיָה מַזִּיק אִילָנוֹת אֲחֵרִים. אוֹ מִפְּנֵי שֶׁמַּזִּיק בִּשְׂדֵה אֲחֵרִים. אוֹ מִפְּנֵי שֶׁדָּמָיו יְקָרִים. לֹא אָסְרָה תּוֹרָה אֶלָּא דֶּרֶךְ הַשְׁחָתָה:
We should not cut down fruit trees outside a city nor prevent an irrigation ditch from bringing water to them so that they dry up, as Deuteronomy 20:19 states: 'Do not destroy its trees.' Anyone who cuts down such a tree should be lashed.
This does not apply only in a siege, but in all situations. Anyone who cuts down a fruit tree with a destructive intent, should be lashed.
Nevertheless, a fruit tree may be cut down if it causes damage to other trees or to fields belonging to others, or if a high price could be received for its wood. The Torah only prohibited cutting down a tree with a destructive intent.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cewy88jle0eo



