History that Rhymes
Parshat Eikev - Beginning with the word eikev, this source sheet explores the Jewish view that history moves forward while echoing the past.

(יב)וְהָיָ֣ה ׀ עֵ֣קֶב תִּשְׁמְע֗וּן אֵ֤ת הַמִּשְׁפָּטִים֙ הָאֵ֔לֶּה וּשְׁמַרְתֶּ֥ם וַעֲשִׂיתֶ֖ם אֹתָ֑ם וְשָׁמַר֩ יְהֹוָ֨ה אֱלֹהֶ֜יךָ לְךָ֗ אֶֽת־הַבְּרִית֙ וְאֶת־הַחֶ֔סֶד אֲשֶׁ֥ר נִשְׁבַּ֖ע לַאֲבֹתֶֽיךָ׃

(12) In the future, as a consequence of your heeding these laws, and your guarding and fulfilling them; Adonoy, your God, will guard for you the covenant and the kindliness that He swore to your forefathers. [Metsudah Publications, 2009]

Now it shall be:

because of your hearkening to these regulations, by keeping and observing [them],

that YHWH will keep for you the covenant of loyalty that he swore to your fathers;

[Everett Fox]

וִיהֵי חֳלַף דִּי תְקַבְּלוּן יָת דִּינַיָּא הָאִלֵּין וְתִטְּרוּן וְתַעְבְּדוּן יָתְהוֹן וְיִטַּר יְיָ אֱלָהָךְ לָךְ יָת קְיָמָא וְיָת חִסְדָּא דִּי קַיִּים לַאֲבָהָתָךְ:

In the future, as a consequence of [in exchange for] your heeding these laws, and your guarding and fulfilling them; Adonoy, your God, will guard for you the covenant and the kindliness that He swore to your forefathers.

והיה עקב תשמעון. אִם הַמִּצְווֹת קַלּוֹת שֶׁאָדָם דָּשׁ בַּעֲקֵבָיותשמעון.

והיה עקב תשמעון AND THE CONSEQUENCE WILL BE, IF YE HEARKEN (The Hebrew text may be taken to signify if you will hear the heel, עקב) — If, even the lighter commands which a person usually treads on with his heels (i.e. which a person is inclined to treat lightly), ye will hearken to,

עקב. כמו לעולם עקב שכר באחרונה

BECAUSE. Ekev (because) has the same meaning as ekev (reward) in For ever, reward (Ps. 119:112).

נָטִ֣יתִי לִ֭בִּי לַעֲשׂ֥וֹת חֻקֶּ֗יךָ לְעוֹלָ֥ם עֵֽקֶב׃ {פ}

I am resolved to follow Your laws
to the utmost [Meaning of Heb. uncertain.]

forever.

עֵקֶב (n-m) heb
consequence, gain, reward
end
adv as a consequence, because, consequently
conj as a consequence of, that, because

טַעַם עֵקֶב, כְּמוֹ בַּעֲבוּר, וְכֵן עֵקֶב אֲשֶׁר שָׁמַע אַבְרָהָם בְּקֹלִי (בראשית כו ה), וְכָתַב רַשִׁ"י (רש"י על דברים ז':י"ב) אִם הַמִּצְוֹת הַקַּלּוֹת שֶׁאָדָם דָּשׁ בַּעֲקֵבָיו תִּשְׁמָעוּן יִשְׁמֹר לְךָ הַשֵּׁם הַבְטָחָתוֹ.... וְהַמְּפָרְשִׁים אָמְרוּ כִּי טַעַם עֵקֶב שָׂכָר בָּאַחֲרִית, וְכֵן בְּשָׁמְרָם עֵקֶב רָב (תהלים יט יב), יֹאמַר וְהָיָה אַחֲרִית תִּשְׁמְעוּן הַמִּשְׁפָּטִים וְתִשְׁמְרוּ אוֹתָם שֶׁיִּשְׁמֹר הַשֵּׁם לְךָ אֶת הַבְּרִית וְהַחֶסֶד, וַאֲהֵבְךָ. וְנָכוֹן הוּא, כִּי יִקְרְאוּ בִּלְשׁוֹן הַקֹּדֶשׁ תְּחִלַּת כָּל דָּבָר בִּלְשׁוֹן רֹאשׁ, כְּעִנְיַן רֹאשׁ דְּבָרְךָ אֱמֶת (שם קיט קס), וְכֵן גְּדוֹל הַדּוֹר רֹאשׁ הָעָם (במדבר כה ד), וְהַמְּשֻׁבָּח רֹאשׁ בְּשָׂמִים (שיר השירים ד יד), וְכֵן יִקְרְאוּ אַחֲרִית כָּל דָּבָר עֵקֶב, כִּי הַלָּשׁוֹן יִתְפֹּס דִּמְיוֹנוֹ בְּאָדָם, וְהָרֹאשׁ תְּחִלָּה וְהֶעָקֵב בּוֹ אַחֲרִית וָסוֹף. וְכֵן יֹאמַר הַכָּתוּב (להלן כח יג מד) לְרֹאשׁ וּלְזָנָב, לְדִמְיוֹן גּוּף בְּהֵמָה. וְאוּנְקְלוֹס (תרגום אונקלוס על דברים ז':י"ב) תִּרְגֵּם חֲלָף, כְּמוֹ חֵלֶף עֲבֹדַתְכֶם (במדבר יח לא), עֲשָׂאוֹ לְשׁוֹן סִבּוּב, נִגְזַר מִן וְהָיָה הֶעָקֹב לְמִישׁוֹר (ישעיהו מ ד), הַדֶּרֶךְ הַמְּעֻקָּל הַהֹלֵךְ סָבִיב סָבִיב, וְכֵן עֲקֻבָּה מִדָּם (הושע ו ח), מְסֻבֶּבֶת וּמֻקֶּפֶת, יֹאמַר וְהָיָה סִבַּת שִׁמְעֲכֶם הַמִּשְׁפָּטִים וַעֲשׂוֹתְכֶם אוֹתָם שֶׁיִּשְׁמֹר הַשֵּׁם לָכֶם בְּרִיתוֹ. וְיָפֶה פֵּרֵשׁ, וְדוֹמֶה לָזֶה בִּגְלַל הַדָּבָר הַזֶּה (דברים ט"ו:י'), בְּסִבָּתוֹ, מִלְּשׁוֹן וְגָלְלוּ אֶת הָאֶבֶן (בראשית כט ג). וְכֵן עַל דַּעְתִּי כָּל לְשׁוֹן עֲקִיבָה גִּלְגּוּל וְסִבּוּב, עָקוֹב הַלֵּב (ירמיהו יז ט), וַיַּעְקְבֵנִי זֶה פַעֲמַיִם (בראשית כז לו), וְיֵהוּא עָשָׂה בְּעָקְבָּה (מלכים ב י יט), עִנְיַן גִּלְגּוּלִין וְסִבּוֹת, וְלָכֵן יִקְרְאוּ יַעֲקֹב יְשֻׁרוּן, כִּי הֵפֶךְ הֶעָקֹב מִישׁוֹר. וְכֵן אֲחוֹרֵי הָרֶגֶל שֶׁנִּקְרָא עֵקֶב, וְיָדוֹ אֹחֶזֶת בַּעֲקֵב עֵשָׂו (בראשית כה כו), יִקְרָאֶנּוּ כֵן בַּעֲבוּר הֱיוֹתוֹ מְעֻגָּל, כַּאֲשֶׁר יִקְרָא הַלָּשׁוֹן אֶמְצַע הַיָּד וְהָרֶגֶל כַּפּוֹת, בַּעֲבוּר הֱיוֹתָם כְּמוֹ כַּפּוֹת הַזָּהָב. וּמֻרְגָּל הוּא בַּלָּשׁוֹן, כְּמוֹ שֶׁאָמְרוּ בְּסִפְרֵי (ברכה ב) מִימִינוֹ אֵשׁ דָּת לָמוֹ (דברים ל"ג:ב'), כְּשֶׁהָיָה יוֹצֵא הַדִּבּוּר מִפִּי הקב"ה הָיָה יוֹצֵא דֶּרֶךְ יְמִינוֹ שֶׁל קֹדֶשׁ לִשְׂמֹאלָן שֶׁל יִשְׂרָאֵל, וְעוֹקֵב אֶת מַחֲנֵה יִשְׂרָאֵל שְׁנֵים עָשָׂר מִיל עַל שְׁנֵים עָשָׂר מִיל, כְּלוֹמַר מַקִּיף. וְכֵן לְשׁוֹנָם (ב"ק קיג) בָּאִים עָלָיו בַּעֲקִיפִין, בְּסִבּוֹת וְגִלְגּוּלִין, כְּמוֹ עֲקִיבִין, שֶׁשְּׁתֵּי הָאוֹתִיּוֹת הָאֵלֶּה שָׁווֹת לָהֶן כַּאֲשֶׁר פֵּרַשְׁתִּי כְּבָר (ויקרא יט כ)....

AND IT SHALL COME TO PASS ‘EIKEV’ YE HEARKEN. Eikev means “because.” So also, ‘eikev’ (because) that Abraham hearkened to My voice. And Rashi wrote: “If you will hearken even to the lighter commandments which a person usually treads upon with his ‘heels’ [i.e., those commandments which a person is inclined to treat lightly] then G-d will keep His promise to you.” ...
And the commentators have said that the meaning of the word eikev is that “in the end” there will be reward. Similarly, in keeping them [the ordinances of G-d] ‘eikev rav’ (there is [in the end] great reward). The verse here is thus stating: “and the end [the ultimate consequence] of your hearkening to the ordinances and your observing them is that G-d shall keep the covenant and the mercy, and He will love thee. ”

This is correct, for in the Sacred Language the beginning of anything is called rosh [literally: “head”], as it is said, ‘rosh’ (the beginning of) Thy word is truth. So also is the leader of the generation called “the head of the people,” and the best of spices is called rosh.

Similarly, the conclusion of any matter is called akeiv (heel) as the Sacred Language adopts these figurative expressions from the human body; and thus “the head” is the beginning while “the heel” is the conclusion and end of the body.

Scripture also speaks of the head and the tail [with reference to people], figuratively using the body of the animal.

And Onkelos rendered the word eikev as chalaf (“in exchange for”), like ‘cheilef’ (in return for) your service. Onkelos thus made it an expression of “roundabout” [the end result of a series of events], derived from the verse, and ‘he’akov(the crooked) shall be made straight — that is, the circuitous road which goes roundabout [will become a straight, level path].

So also ‘akubah’ of blood means “it is surrounded and encircled” [with blood]. The verse here is thus stating [according to Onkelos]: “and it shall come to pass that the effect caused by your hearkening to the ordinances and your performing them will be that G-d will keep His covenant with you.” He has explained it well. A similar expression is biglal’ (for the sake of) this thing which means “on account of,” from the word ‘v’gal’lu’ (and they roll) the stone. Similarly it is my opinion that every expression of akeivah is a term denoting “circle” or “circuit.” Thus: ‘akov haleiv’ (the heart is deceitful); ‘vaya’akveini’ (and he hath gotten the better of me) these two times; but Jehu did it ‘b’akbah’ (in subtlety) — all these being expressions of “rolling” and “circling.” Therefore they called Jacob “Jeshurun” [from the root yashar (straight and upright)] because the opposite of “the deceitful one” is he who is “upright” [as indicated by the name “Jeshurun”]. Similarly, the end-part of the foot, called akeiv — as it is said, and his hand seizing ‘ba’akeiv (the heel) of Esau — is so called because of its roundness, just as the [Sacred] Language calls the middle part [palm and sole] of the hand and foot kapoth, because of their being shaped like golden kapoth (spoons). This usage [of the term akeiv] is common in the [Sacred] Language, just as the Rabbis have said in the Sifre: “At His right hand was a fiery law unto them. When the word came forth from the mouth of the Holy One, blessed be He, it would go by way of the right hand of the Holy One to the left of Israel, v’okeiv (and it encircled) the camp of Israel twelve miles by twelve miles.” So also is the expression: “they come upon him ba’akifin,” meaning “with circuitous and subtle arguments,” like the word akeivin as these two letters [the veth and the fei] were considered by the Sages to be interchangeable, as I have already explained. ...

וַיַּעֲבֹר אַבְרָם בָּאָרֶץ עַד מְקוֹם שְׁכֶם אוֹמַר לְךָ כְּלָל תָּבִין אוֹתוֹ בְּכָל הַפָּרָשִׁיּוֹת הַבָּאוֹת בְּעִנְיַן אַבְרָהָם יִצְחָק וְיַעֲקֹב, וְהוּא עִנְיָן גָּדוֹל הִזְכִּירוּהוּ רַבּוֹתֵינוּ בְּדֶרֶךְ קְצָרָה וְאָמְרוּ (תנחומא ט), כָּל מָה שֶׁאֵרַע לָאָבוֹת סִימָן לַבָּנִים. וְלָכֵן יַאֲרִיכוּ הַכְּתוּבִים בְּסִפּוּר הַמַּסָּעוֹת וַחֲפִירַת הַבְּאֵרוֹת וּשְׁאָר הַמִּקְרִים, וְיַחְשֹׁב הַחוֹשֵׁב בָּהֶם כְּאִלּוּ הֵם דְּבָרִים מְיֻתָּרִים אֵין בָּהֶם תּוֹעֶלֶת, וְכֻלָּם בָּאִים לְלַמֵּד עַל הֶעָתִיד,... וּלְפִיכָךְ הֶחֱזִיק הקב"ה אֶת אַבְרָהָם בָּאָרֶץ וְעָשָׂה לוֹ דִּמְיוֹנוֹת בְּכָל הֶעָתִיד לְהֵעָשׂוֹת בְּזַרְעוֹ, וְהָבֵן זֶה.

AND ABRAM PASSED THROUGH THE LAND. I will tell you a principle by which you will understand all the coming portions of Scripture concerning Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. It is indeed a great matter which our Rabbis mentioned briefly, saying: “Whatever has happened to the patriarchs is a sign to the children.” It is for this reason that the verses narrate at great length the account of the journeys of the patriarchs, the digging of the wells, and other events. ... It is for this reason that the Holy One, blessed be He, caused Abraham to take possession of the Land and symbolically did to him all that was destined to happen in the future to his children. Understand this principle.

The Greeks—especially Plato, the Stoics, and Polybius—held cyclical views of history, while the Hebrew Bible is distinctive in insisting that history is moving toward a goal (Creation → Covenant → Redemption). What is unique about the Torah is not simply that it combines linear and cyclical time, but that recurring historical patterns occur within a purposeful historical journey.
Greek
History is governed by:
Fate
Fortune
Political cycles
Rise and fall of states
The pattern repeats because human nature repeats.
Biblical
History has:
Creation
Covenant
Exodus
Sinai
Exile
Return
Redemption
“Jewish time is both cyclical and linear. We are part of nature and its rhythms – the cycle of the seasons and of a human life – as we move from birth through maturity to age and wisdom and sadness as we see the next generation, those who will carry on the story when we are no longer here. But we are also part of history – time as a non-repeating sequence of events, a journey in which no stage is exactly like any that has been or will be. Jewish time is like a fugue between these two themes, the eternal and the ephemeral, the timeless and the timely.”
according to many anthropologists and historians, a quite new and different form of time was born in ancient Israel. Often, this is called linear time. I prefer the phrase covenantal time. The Hebrew Bible is the first document to see time as an arena of change. Tomorrow need not be the same as yesterday. There is nothing given, eternal and immutable about the way we construct societies and live our lives together. Time is not a series of moments traced on the face of a watch, always moving yet always the same. Instead it is a journey with a starting point and a destination, or a story with a beginning, middle and end. Each moment has a meaning, which can only be grasped if we understand where we have come from and where we are going to. This is time not as it is in nature but as it is in history. See: Counting Time, Jonathan Sacks
MOED - Often overlooked in this regard is what the Torah does to the nature festivals of its surrounding cultures. These moments of communal celebration at harvest time are transformed so that they are now associated with critical events in the history of Israel. Judaism replaces nature with history as its basic category of religious experience: .... To be sure, these festivals retain an agricultural substratum, but their primary meaning is thoroughly historicized. Even Shabbat, unknown in pagan antiquity and unrelated to any cycle in nature, is justified historically as recalling the creation of the world.
The consequences of this shift from nature to history reinforce the idea of ethical monotheism. Judaism develops a linear concept of time as opposed to a cyclical one and sanctifies events rather than places. See Judaism and Linear History, Ismar Schorsch
Giambattista Vico(1668 – 1744)saw history not as a straight line of progress, but as a dynamic, spiraling journey – a “corsi e ricorsi” – a dance of rise and fall, creation and decay.
Corso — civilizations develop. Ricorso — they return through recurring stages.
Unlike Enlightenment thinkers who believed only in inevitable progress, Vico thought history advances through recurring patterns. Not circles.
Spirals.
Vico challenged the prevailing rationalism of his era, arguing that human history was not solely driven by reason, but by imagination, passions, and the evolution of language and myth. He proposed that societies move through distinct stages, or “ages,” each with its unique character:
In his Introduction to the New Science Vico says that the first principal aspect of this science is that it is a science of divine providence. Vico examines the conduct of divine providence as it shows itself in and through historicity. This providential order is neither the result of Epicurean chance or Stoic fate. Nor is it the result of sheer human making.
It arises out of man's response to the particular manner in which divine providence makes its claim on man from time to time in human historicity. History is not created or produced by men, but occurs as a result of man's fantastic and archaic response to that which is exterior to man, to that which surpasses and ultimately uses man's desires to design the course and recourse of human historicity. See: Vico's New Science: The Unity of Piety and Wisdom, Joseph P. Vincenzo, Walsh University
The Enlightenment championed "monism"—the belief that there is only one single, objective truth or perfect system for how humans should live.
[Isaiah]Berlin was terrified of monism because he believed it inevitably led to authoritarianism and utopias that justify violence. Berlin was thrilled to find that Vico challenged this by arguing that different cultures possess entirely unique, valid visions of life and values. Vico helped Berlin build his own defining political philosophy: value pluralism, the idea that fundamental human values (like liberty and equality) can genuinely conflict, yet both remain entirely valid.
Enlightenment thinkers like René Descartes dismissed history because it wasn't a cold, objective, mathematical science. Vico countered this with two ideas:
The Verum-Factum Principle: Humans can truly understand society and history because we made it ourselves, whereas only God can fully understand the natural physical world.
Fantasia: Vico argued that to understand the past, we cannot use mathematical formulas; we must use active, empathetic imagination (fantasia) to enter the minds of past cultures. Berlin saw this as the true birth of modern social sciences, cultural anthropology, and genuine historical sympathy.
Johann Gottfried Herder 1744 – 1803
"Each nation bears within itself the standard of its perfection, wholly independent of all comparison with that of others."
The most natural state is one nation with one national character.
In every language dwells the spirit of a nation.
"He must learn to place himself entirely in their point of view... When he has done this, he will be prepared to understand why they thought, and felt, and wrote as they did."
Yosef Hayim Yerushalmi noted that Judaism was uniquely ahead of its time because it did not view history as a natural, cosmic mystery (like the Greeks), but as a human theater where meaning is built through collective memory and moral action—the exact core thesis of Vico's The New Science.