In the Beginning Was a New Idea
We focus on what is missing from Bereshit—and how those omissions suggest a radical new ideation of God and humanity.
Don't miss an episode! Subscribe to the Madlik podcast:
Spotify | Apple Podcasts | YouTube
Link to Substack post: here

(א)בְּרֵאשִׁ֖ית בָּרָ֣א אֱלֹהִ֑ים אֵ֥ת הַשָּׁמַ֖יִם וְאֵ֥ת הָאָֽרֶץ׃

(1) When God began to create heaven and earth— (In contrast to others “In the beginning God created.”) JPS Tanach, 2023

(ב)בראשית ברא ...שֶׁאֵין לְךָ רֵאשִׁית בַּמִּקְרָא שֶׁאֵינוֹ דָבוּק לַתֵּבָה שֶׁלְּאַחֲרָיו, כְּמוֹ בְּרֵאשִׁית מַמְלֶכֶת יְהוֹיָקִים (שׁם כ"ז), רֵאשִׁית מַמְלַכְתּוֹ (בראשית י'), רֵאשִׁית דְּגָנְךָ (דברים י"ח, ד'), – אַף כָּאן אַתָּה אוֹמֵר בְּרֵאשִׁית בָּרָא אֱלֹהִים וְגוֹ', כְּמוֹ בְּרֵאשִׁית בְּרֹא;...

(2) בראשית ברא IN THE BEGINNING GOD CREATED — ...wherever the word ראשית occurs in Scripture, it is in the construct state. e.g., (Jeremiah 26:1) “In the beginning of (בראשית) the reign of Jehoiakim”; (Genesis 10:10) “The beginning of (ראשית) his kingdom”; (Deuteronomy 18:4) “The first fruit of (ראשית) thy corn.” Similarly here you must translate בראשית ברא אלהים as though it read בראשית ברוא, at the beginning of God’s creating. ...

(א)בראשית ... וי"א שהבי"ת נושא (צ"ל נוסף) בלי טעם וטעמם שלא יעלה על לב שאין ראשית לשמים ולארץ ע"כ אמר בראשית, ולפי דעתי שהוא סמוך, כמו, "בראשית ממלכת יהויקים" (ירמי' כ"ו א'),...

(1) IN THE BEGINNING. ... Others say that the bet of bereshit is a preposition. They explain that Scripture intends to preclude the thought that heaven and earth were preexisting. Hence it states, In the beginning. I believe that bereshit is in the construct, as in In the beginning of (bereshit) the reign of Jehoiakim (Jeremiah 26:1). ....

לפי רש״י וראב״ע ורבים מהמפרשים החדשים אין פסוק זה עומד בפני עצמו, אלא קשור הוא במה שיבוא אחריו (פירוש אחד: בתחילת בריאת השמים והארץ, היתה הארץ תוהו ובוהו; פירוש שני: בתחילת בריאת השמים והארץ, בהיות הארץ תוהו ובוהו וגו׳, אמר אלהים יהי אור וגו׳). הפועל ברא משמש לפי רש״י כאילו הוא מקור, ברוא, וכך מנקדים למעשה המפרשים החדשים הנ״ל.

According to Rashi, Ibn Ezra, and many modern commentators, this verse does not stand on its own, but is connected syntactically to what follows it.

One interpretation is: “At the beginning of the creation of heaven and earth, the earth was unformed and void.”

A second interpretation is: “At the beginning of the creation of heaven and earth, when the earth was unformed and void, etc., God said, ‘Let there be light,’ etc.”

According to Rashi, the verb בָּרָא (bara, “created”) functions as though it were an infinitive, בְּרוֹא (bero, “the creating of / when [God] created”), and this is in fact how the aforementioned modern commentators understand the vocalization syntactically.

To be sure, any work of hoary antiquity is bound to prove difficult reading. Problems of text and language are unavoidable. The modes of literary expression will be strange to our ears. The categories of thought will undoubtedly differ from those of modern man. The socio-cultural milieu presupposed by narrative and law must be utterly alien to our fast-moving, complex, technological, megalopolitan society in the nuclear age. The historical allusions to events of local, national and international importance that lie behind the text require scholarly commentary to be made intelligible. Even to the religiously oriented, some of the religious concepts and values will hardly be palatable today.
This situation, however, is only part of the story. Strictly speaking, it is not wholly a product of modern times, for it existed as soon as the ancient Near Eastern world succumbed to the flood-tides of Hellenism. The old culture from which the Hebrew Bible had issued disintegrated and became radically transformed. Tradition had been breached and the Scriptures of the Jews could no longer be easily read; they could only be studied. Nahum Sarna, Understanding Genesis
Accordingly, we have constantly emphasized in this book the importance of difference,.. those areas in which Israel parted company with its neighbors.
it is in this sphere that the uniqueness of biblical literature becomes apparent. The Hebrew cosmology represents a revolutionary break with the contemporary world, a parting of the spiritual ways that involved the undermining of the entire prevailing mythological world-view.
Nowhere else in the contemporary world did it become the regnant idea, obsessive and historically significant. Israel's monotheism constituted a new creation, a revolution in religion, a sudden transformation.
the extraordinary consciousness of difference which characterized ancient Israel and which superimposed itself upon the awareness of a common background and the close and uninterrupted relationships with the other peoples of the Fertile Crescent. Israel saw its development and fate as unique. It felt itself to be "distinguished . . . from every people on the face of the earth,” (EXOD. 33:16) "set apart from other peoples,” (LEV. 20:24; cf. v. 26)
the outstanding peculiarity of the biblical account is the complete absence of mythology in the classical pagan sense of the term. The religion of Israel is essentially non-mythological, there being no suggestion of any theo-biography. The Scriptures themselves do not openly betray a true understanding of mythological paganism. In fact, as a result of their thorough-going monotheism the picture they paint of the religion of the contemporaries of Israel is really a distortion.
Pagan representation of the gods by pictures and images, and its use of icons in worship, are conceived by the biblical writers to be nothing more than fetishism. In short, so remote are the biblical writers from the religious atmosphere of the pagan world that they are unable to present a true picture of it. [For a full treatment of this theory see THE BIBLE AND MYTHOLOGICAL POLYTHEISM, YEHEZKEL KAUFMANN
HEBREW UNIVERSITY, JERUSALEM
Nowhere is this non-mythological outlook better illustrated than in the Genesis narrative. The Hebrew account is matchless in its solemn and majestic simplicity. It has no notion of the birth of God and no biography of God. It does not even begin with a statement about the existence of God.
paganism.
In polytheistic mythologies creation is always expressed in terms of procreation. On the other hand, the Creator in Genesis is uniquely without any female counterpart and the very association of sex with God is utterly alien to the religion of the Bible.
For the first time in history, therefore, we have a totally new conception of cosmogony and one, strangely enough, that in its literary form has not hesitated to make use of some of the symbols of its ideologically incompatible predecessor. This is a characteristic of the Genesis narrative that we shall encounter again and again. Sarna ibid
The Torah does not begin:
בראשית היה אלהים — “In the beginning, God was.”
It doesn't make God's existence a proposition requiring assertion or proof.
It begins with a verb of divine action:
בָּרָא אֱלֹהִים — God created.
God's existence is grammatically taken for granted.
God's existence is self-evident; it begins immediately with the activity of the preexistent God.

2. נפוצים היו בארצות המזרח סיפורי פלאים על יצירתו של עולם, סיפורים מסיפורים שונים, ורבים מהם לבשו צורה ספרותית בשירי עלילה או בחיבורים אחרים. בהמשך פירושנו תזדמננה לנו הזדמנויות שונות להזכיר כמה פרטים מתוך מקורות אלה, ולתרגם פסוקים אחדים מפסוקיהם. כאן די יהיה לרמוז במלים קצרות לאפיים הכללי. פותחים היו כרגיל בתיאוגוניה, כלומר בתולדות האלים, בהשתלשלות דורות האלים שקדמו לתולדות העולם והאנושות, ומגידים היו על ניגודים בין רצונו של אל זה ובין רצונו של אל זה, על סכסוכים שפרצו מתוך ניגודים אלה, ועל מלחמות אדירות שהתנהלו בין האלים. את התהוות העולם היו קושרים בהתהוות האלים ובסכסוכים ובמלחמות שביניהם, ואת חלקי העולם השונים היו מזהים באלים מסויימים או בחלקים מסויימים של גופי האלים. גם יחידי הסגולה שבאומות, הוגי הדעות שזכו להגיע לפי שעה להשקפות יותר נעלות מאלה הרגילות בסביבתם, כגון אמנחתף הרביעי מלך מצרים שיחס את כל היצירה לאחד האלים, ל־Aten אל השמש, ואלה שקדמו לו (התגליות של השנים האחרונות הוכיחו שלא הוא היה הראשון שנקט בשיטה זו), גם הם תיארו להם את האל הזה כאחד האלים – ואם גם כגדול שבכולם – כאל קשור בטבע ומזדהה בחלק מחלקי הטבע. באה התורה והתרוממה, כעל כנפי נשרים, ממעל לכל השקפות אלה. לא אלים רבים, אלא אל אחד; לא תיאוגוניה, כי אין לאל תולדות; לא מלחמות ולא סכסוכים ולא ניגודים בין רצון לרצון, אלא רק רצון אחד השולט על הכל בלי מעצור ובלי ניגוד כל שהוא; לא אל קשור בטבע ומזדהה בטבע או במקצתו, אלא אל העומד ממעל לטבע ומחוץ לו בהחלט, אל שכל הטבע וכל חלקי הטבע כולם, גם השמש ויתר העצמים הנשגבים ביותר, אינם אלא בריותיו שנבראו כרצונו. ...

All kinds of wondrous stories about the creation of the world were wide-spread throughout the lands of the East, and many of them assumed a literary form in epic poems or other compositions. In the course of our exposition we shall have repeated occasion to refer to a number of matters found in these sources and to translate several verses from their texts. Here it will suffice to indicate briefly their general character. They began, as a rule, with a theogony, that is, with the origin of the gods, the genealogy of the deities who preceded the birth of the world and mankind; and they told of the antagonism between this god and that god, of frictions that arose from these clashes of will, and of mighty wars that were waged by the gods. They connected the genesis of the world with the genesis of the gods and with the hostilities and wars between them; and they identified the different parts of the universe with given deities or with certain parts of their bodies. Even the elect few among the nations, the thinkers who for a time attained to loftier concepts than those normally held in their environment, men like Amenhotep IV—the Egyptian king who attributed the entire creation to one of the gods, the sun-god Aten—and his predecessors (the discoveries of recent years prove that he was not the first to hold this doctrine), even they pictured this god to themselves as but one of the gods, be he the very greatest, as a deity linked to nature and identifiable with one of its component parts.

Then came the Torah and soared aloft, as on eagles’ wings, above all these notions. Not many gods but One God; not theogony, for a god has no family tree; not wars nor strife, nor the clash of wills, but only One Will, which rules over everything, without the slightest let or hindrance; not a deity associated with nature and identified with it wholly or in part, but a God who stands absolutely above nature, and outside of it, and nature and all its constituent elements, even the sun and all the other entities, be they never so exalted, are only His creatures, made according to His will.

The Torah doesn't refute theogony. It doesn't even discuss theogony. It has lost the vocabulary with which the question could be asked.
Genesis doesn't argue:
“Contrary to the Babylonians, our God wasn't born.”
It cannot imagine why God would be born.
Biblical stories were not created ex nihilo from the imaginations of writers. Most biblical stories represent adaptations of oral traditions, traditions that were modified in order to suit the interests of the writers. But motifs that are appropriate for tales in secular contexts do not necessarily fit a religious context. Indeed, the beginnings of interpretation lie in this process of coping with prior oral traditions. Writers adapted popular traditions by making only minimal changes and interpretations. On the one hand, they wanted to elevate the traditions to their own religious world-view. On the other, they tried to preserve a maximal resemblance to the source story, in order to gain the trust of the reader, who was familiar with the original tale. The balance struck by these writers as they tread carefully between preservation and innovation is an interpretative process that imparted new meaning to the old traditions. See: Jacob: An Uneasy Patriarch, By Yair Zakovitch
What I am suggesting is that the contemporary audiences of these tales, being perfectly familiar with the convention, took particular pleasure in seeing how in each instance the convention could be, through the narrator’s art, both faithfully followed and renewed for the specific needs of the hero under consideration. In some cases, moreover, the biblical authors, counting on their audience’s familiarity with the features and function of the type-scene, could merely allude to the type-scene or present a transfigured version of it. Robert Alter, The Art of Biblical Narrative p. 78 in chapter titled: “Biblical Type-Scenes and the Uses of Convention.”

(א)סדר יום שמחת תורה. ובו סעיף אחד:
במקום שעושין שני ימים טובים ליל תשיעי מקדשין ואומרים זמן ולמחר מוציאין שלשה ספרים וקורין באחד וזאת הברכה עד סוף התורה ובשניה בראשית עד אשר ברא אלהים לעשות ובשלישית קורא המפטיר כמו אתמול ומפטיר ויהי אחרי מות משה: הגה וקורין י"ט האחרון שמחת תורה לפי ששמחין ועושין בו סעודת משתה לגמרה של תורה ונוהגין שהמסיים התורה והמתחיל בראשית נודרים נדבות וקוראים לאחרים לעשות משתה (טור) ...

(1)The Order of Simchat Torah:
In places where they do two days of Yom Tov, Kiddush on the ninth night includes Shehecheyanu. The next day, we take out three Torah scrolls. From the first, we read "And this is the blessing" [Deuteronomy 33:1] until the end of the Torah. From the second, we read from "In the beginning" [Genesis 1:1] until "that God made" [2:3]. From the third, the maftir reads the same as the previous day. The haftarah is "After Moses died" [Joshua 1:1]. Rema: The last day of Yom Tov is called "Simchat Torah" because we rejoice on it, making a festive meal in honor of the finishing of the Torah. It is customary for the person who finishes the Torah and the one who starts Genesis to make a donation and invite everybody to a party (Tur). ...

(יב) וּלְכֹל֙ הַיָּ֣ד הַחֲזָקָ֔ה וּלְכֹ֖ל הַמּוֹרָ֣א הַגָּד֑וֹל אֲשֶׁר֙ עָשָׂ֣ה מֹשֶׁ֔ה לְעֵינֵ֖י כׇּל־יִשְׂרָאֵֽל׃

(12) and for all the great might and awesome power that Moses displayed before all Israel.

(א)בְּרֵאשִׁ֖ית בָּרָ֣א אֱלֹהִ֑ים אֵ֥ת הַשָּׁמַ֖יִם וְאֵ֥ת הָאָֽרֶץ׃

(1) When God began to create heaven and earth—

המשך התורה לעיני כל ישראל בראשית ברא. ... לעיני כל ישראל ר"ת כלי שהם כלי לברר על ידם פירוש מעשה בראשית. ... וזה כח מעשיו הגיד לעמו ולהם פקיחת עין.

Every individual Israelite has a unique mode of perception, through which he is able to see and apprehend something particular in the world that no one else can see. .... And to them was given an opening of the eye...

R. Yitzchak (Yitzchak Feivish) Ginsburgh who founded the Gal Einai institute (Literaly the "Open my Eye" Institute writes:
לכן משה תיקן את בחינת הראיה ("אשר עשה משה לעיני כל ישראל", משה עשה-תיקן את הראיה של עיני כל ישראל).
Therefore Moses fixed the faculty of sight — as in, “which Moses did to the eyes of all Israel”: Moses made/fixed the vision of the eyes of all Israel.

(י) רַבִּי יוֹנָה בְּשֵׁם רַבִּי לֵוִי אָמַר, לָמָּה נִבְרָא הָעוֹלָם בְּב', אֶלָּא מַה ב' זֶה סָתוּם מִכָּל צְדָדָיו וּפָתוּחַ מִלְּפָנָיו, כָּךְ אֵין לְךָ רְשׁוּת לוֹמַר, מַה לְּמַטָּה, מַה לְּמַעְלָה, מַה לְּפָנִים, מַה לְּאָחוֹר, אֶלָּא מִיּוֹם שֶׁנִּבְרָא הָעוֹלָם וּלְהַבָּא..... אָמַר רַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר בַּר חֲנִינָא בְּשֵׁם רַבִּי אֲחָא, עֶשְׂרִים וְשִׁשָּׁה דוֹרוֹת הָיְתָה הָאָלֶ"ף קוֹרֵא תִּגָּר לִפְנֵי כִסְאוֹ שֶׁל הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא, אָמְרָה לְפָנָיו רִבּוֹנוֹ שֶׁל עוֹלָם, אֲנִי רִאשׁוֹן שֶׁל אוֹתִיּוֹת וְלֹא בָּרָאתָ עוֹלָמְךָ בִּי, אָמַר לָהּ הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא הָעוֹלָם וּמְלוֹאוֹ לֹא נִבְרָא אֶלָּא בִּזְכוּת הַתּוֹרָה, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (משלי ג, יט): ה' בְּחָכְמָה יָסַד אָרֶץ וגו', לְמָחָר אֲנִי בָּא לִתֵּן תּוֹרָה בְּסִינַי וְאֵינִי פּוֹתֵחַ תְּחִלָה אֶלָּא בָּךְ, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (שמות כ, ב): אָנֹכִי ה' אֱלֹהֶיךָ...

(10) Rabbi Yona said in the name of Rabbi Levi: Why was the world created with the letter beit? It is because just as the beit is closed on all [three of] its sides but open in its front, so, you do not have permission to ask: What is below, what is above, what was before, and what is after, but only from the day when the world created and onward. ...
Rabbi Elazar bar Ḥanina said in the name of Rabbi Aḥa: For twenty-six generations the alef complained before the throne of the Holy One blessed be He. It said before Him: ‘Master of the universe, I am the first of the letters, but You did not create Your world with me.’ The Holy One blessed be He said to it: ‘The world and all its contents were created only for the sake of the Torah, as it is stated: “The Lord founded the earth with wisdom…” (Proverbs 3:19). Tomorrow, I will be coming to give the Torah at Sinai, and I will open it at its beginning only with you, as it is stated: “I [anokhi] am the Lord your God”’ (Exodus 20:2). ...

So maybe the great revolution of Bereshit is hiding in plain sight.
The Torah doesn't begin by telling us where God came from. There is no birth of God. No genealogy of God. No struggle among the gods out of which one supreme God emerges.
And following Rashi and Ibn Ezra, even the primordial stuff of creation—the darkness, the deep, the waters—is simply there when God's creative activity begins. The Torah doesn't stop to explain where any of it came from.
Because cosmology is not what the story is interested in.
The Torah isn't interested in origins nearly as much as it is interested in what happens next.
And that's when maybe we should stop looking at the nouns and start looking at the verbs.
וַיֹּאמֶר — God speaks.
God creates through language. Before changing the world, God articulates what it might become.
וַיַּבְדֵּל — God distinguishes.
Light from darkness. Waters above from waters below. Sea from dry land. Day from night. Creation proceeds by making distinctions, by recognizing that this is not that.
וַיִּקְרָא — God names.
“God called the light Day, and the darkness He called Night.” Once things have been distinguished, they can be identified. They can be given names. They can assume a place within an ordered world.
And again and again:
וַיַּרְא אֱלֹהִים כִּי־טוֹב — “And God saw that it was good.”
God evaluates. God doesn't simply make a world and walk away from it. God looks at what has emerged and assigns value.
So God speaks. God distinguishes. God names. God selects and orders. God evaluates. And ultimately, God blesses.
God doesn't merely make things. God makes distinctions. God makes meaning.
And then comes the verse that turns this entire creation story back upon us:
וַיִּבְרָא אֱלֹהִים אֶת־הָאָדָם בְּצַלְמוֹ
“And God created the human being in His image.”
Maybe being created in the image of God isn't only a statement about what we are. Maybe the Torah has spent the preceding verses showing us what it means.
God creates—and then creates us in the image of the Creator.
We too are given a world.
We speak.
We distinguish.
We name.
We select.
We order.
We decide what matters.
We recognize and assign value—כי טוב.
And ultimately, like God, we bless.
Which brings us all the way back to where we started—to those extraordinary last words of the Torah:
אֲשֶׁר עָשָׂה מֹשֶׁה לְעֵינֵי כָּל־יִשְׂרָאֵל
followed immediately, on Simchat Torah, by:
בְּרֵאשִׁית בָּרָא אֱלֹהִים
The Sefat Emet says that every Israelite possesses a unique way of seeing, something in the world that no one else can see, and that Israel was given a פקיחת עין — an opening of the eye.
And that wonderful Hasidic reading we saw takes it one step further: משה עשה־תיקן את הראיה של עיני כל ישראל — Moses “made,” Moses rectified the vision of the eyes of all Israel.
Maybe that's exactly what the Torah has done.
It has changed Israel's eyes.
It has created a people who can hear the opening words of a creation story and no longer ask: Where was God born? Who were God's parents? Which god defeated which other god? How did this God become supreme?
Those questions have simply disappeared.
The paradigm has shifted.
And once our eyes have changed, Bereshit asks us to look not behind God, but at what God does.
God takes the world that is there and begins to work with it: speaking, distinguishing, naming, ordering, valuing, blessing.
And then God creates us בְּצַלְמוֹ—in the image of the One who does all those things.
So perhaps the radical claim of the creation story isn't simply a claim about God. It's a claim about us.
We aren't spectators of creation.
We are created to continue it.
We don't begin with nothing. We begin with a world already given to us—with its light and its darkness, its order and its chaos, its possibilities and its limitations.
Creation is what we do with what we've been given.