A Rabbi a Pope and Babel
Noach - The Netziv and Pope Leo read the Tower of Babel as a warning against conformity. Their alternative is a community of individuals.
Don't miss an episode! Subscribe to the Madlik podcast:
Spotify | Apple Podcasts | YouTube
Link to Substack post: here

(א) וַיְהִ֥י כׇל־הָאָ֖רֶץ שָׂפָ֣ה אֶחָ֑ת וּדְבָרִ֖ים אֲחָדִֽים׃ (ב) וַיְהִ֖י בְּנׇסְעָ֣ם מִקֶּ֑דֶם וַֽיִּמְצְא֥וּ בִקְעָ֛ה בְּאֶ֥רֶץ שִׁנְעָ֖ר וַיֵּ֥שְׁבוּ שָֽׁם׃ (ג) וַיֹּאמְר֞וּ אִ֣ישׁ אֶל־רֵעֵ֗הוּ הָ֚בָה נִלְבְּנָ֣ה לְבֵנִ֔ים וְנִשְׂרְפָ֖ה לִשְׂרֵפָ֑ה וַתְּהִ֨י לָהֶ֤ם הַלְּבֵנָה֙ לְאָ֔בֶן וְהַ֣חֵמָ֔ר הָיָ֥ה לָהֶ֖ם לַחֹֽמֶר׃ (ד) וַיֹּאמְר֞וּ הָ֣בָה ׀ נִבְנֶה־לָּ֣נוּ עִ֗יר וּמִגְדָּל֙ וְרֹאשׁ֣וֹ בַשָּׁמַ֔יִם וְנַֽעֲשֶׂה־לָּ֖נוּ שֵׁ֑ם פֶּן־נָפ֖וּץ עַל־פְּנֵ֥י כׇל־הָאָֽרֶץ׃ (ה) וַיֵּ֣רֶד יְהֹוָ֔ה לִרְאֹ֥ת אֶת־הָעִ֖יר וְאֶת־הַמִּגְדָּ֑ל אֲשֶׁ֥ר בָּנ֖וּ בְּנֵ֥י הָאָדָֽם׃ (ו) וַיֹּ֣אמֶר יְהֹוָ֗ה הֵ֣ן עַ֤ם אֶחָד֙ וְשָׂפָ֤ה אַחַת֙ לְכֻלָּ֔ם וְזֶ֖ה הַחִלָּ֣ם לַעֲשׂ֑וֹת וְעַתָּה֙ לֹֽא־יִבָּצֵ֣ר מֵהֶ֔ם כֹּ֛ל אֲשֶׁ֥ר יָזְמ֖וּ לַֽעֲשֽׂוֹת׃ (ז) הָ֚בָה נֵֽרְדָ֔ה וְנָבְלָ֥ה שָׁ֖ם שְׂפָתָ֑ם אֲשֶׁר֙ לֹ֣א יִשְׁמְע֔וּ אִ֖ישׁ שְׂפַ֥ת רֵעֵֽהוּ׃

(1) Everyone on earth had the same language and the same words. (2) And as they migrated from the east, they came upon a valley in the land of Shinar and settled there. (3) They said to one another, “Come, let us make bricks and burn them hard.”—Brick served them as stone, and bitumen served them as mortar.— (4) And they said, “Come, let us build us a city, and a tower with its top in the sky, to make a name for ourselves; else we shall be scattered all over the world.” (5) GOD came down to look at the city and tower that the mortals had built, (6) and GOD said, “If, as one people with one language for all, this is how they have begun to act, then nothing that they may propose to do will be out of their reach. (7) Let us, then, go down and confound their speech there, so that they shall not understand one another’s speech.”

(א) שפה אחת. זה גרם לחטא א׳. היינו שיסכימו לשבת כולן בקבוץ אחד. וזהו נגד רצון ה׳ שאמר שרצו בארץ ורבו בה היינו להתהלך לארכה ולרחבה כי לשבת יצרה:

(ב)ודברים אחדים. לא ביאר הכתוב הדברים אלא ברמז כמבואר במדרשים אבל לא פירשן הכתוב כי אם שהיו דברים אחדים וללמדנו דלא משום הדברים התעורר הקב״ה. כי אם בשביל שהיו אחדים. יהיו מה שיהיו. ודבר זה אם כי לפי הנראה אין בזה שום עון ואדרבה חבור עצבים ג״כ ראוי להניח. אבל כאן גרם לחשוב דבר שיצא לתקלת הישוב כאשר יבואר:

(א) ונשרפה לשרפה וגו׳. כל המקרא אין בו ענין שראוי להודיע לענין הספור ומה לי אם היו להם אבנים לבנין או בנו בעץ או עשו שריפת לבנים וכבר לפני המבול כתיב ויהי בנה עיר. ונראה בכאן מרומז קבלת חז״ל דהפילו לא״א לכבשן האש. ומגוף המקרא אשר הוצאתיך מאור כשדים אין הכרח. דלפי הפשט הוא מקום נקרא הכי וכמו דכתיב בארץ מולדתו באור כשדים ויצאו אתם מאור כשדים וגו׳ אלא כאן מרומז הענין דהא ודאי דלפי הקבלה שהפילו את א״א לכבשן האש. לא עשו כבשן האש בשביל זה אלא היה אתון נורא יקידתא לצורך הבריות. והודיע זה הכתוב שהיה כבשן לצורך העיר והמגדל. ומזה נבין כמה גדול ועמוק היה הכבשן ומזה הכבשן ניצול א״א. והא שלא פירש המקרא זה הנס באר היטב יבואר להלן י״ב י״ז:

(א) וראשו בשמים. זה ודאי לא יעלה עה״ד שיהיה עיר אחת לכל העולם אלא כסבורים שיהיו כל הערים סמוכות וטפלות לאותו העיר שבה המגדל ויהיה המגדל לצפות ממנו למרחוק אחר כל הישוב שלהם שלא יהיו נפרדים בארץ אחרת. ע״כ נצרך שיהיה ראשו בשמים.

(ב)ונעשה לנו שם.אנשים משגיחים וממונים על הדבר ויהיו שרי צבא להעניש את העובר. דבל״ז אינו מועיל המגדל. כ״ז היה לחשש.

(ג) פן נפוץ על פני כל הארץ. אמנם יש להבין מה חששו אם יצאו כמה לארץ אחרת. ומובן שזה היה שייך לדברים אחדים שהיה ביניהם ובאשר אין דעות ב״א שוים חששו שלא יצאו ב״א מדעה זו ויהיו במחשבה אחרת ע״כ היו משגיחים שלא יצא איש מישוב שלהם. ומי שסר מדברים אחדים שביניהם היה משפטו לשריפה כאשר עשו לא״א. נמצא היו דברים אחדים שביניהם לרועץ שהחליטו להרוג את מי שלא יחשוב כדעתם. ויבואר עוד להלן ו׳:

... (א) הן עם אחד. משמעות עם היינו במנהג אחד כמש״כ להלן כ״ח ג׳ בפי׳ והיית לקהל עמים: (ב)וזה החלם לעשות. עתה אינו אלא התחלת דבר עבירה במה שרוצים שיהיו בישוב אחד: (ג)ועתה לא יבצר מהם כל אשר יזמו לעשות. אם יגמרו המגדל יבואו למחשבה שניה למנוע בע״כ היוצא ממחשבתם זו. וזהו דבר רצח ושוד המשחית את הישוב לגמרי ולזה לא מועיל מה שכעת המה מתאחדים בדעה : (א) אשר לא ישמעו. כי יש שנים מדברים בשפות שונות. ומ״מ מבינים מה שמדברים. ע״כ פי׳ ונבלה שפתם. באופן אשר לא ישמעו איש שפת רעהו שלא יבינו כלל: (א) ויפץ ה׳ אתם וגו׳ ויחדלו לבנת העיר. ולא כתיב המגדל דאפי׳ היה נבנה המגדל היה בטל תכליתו להשגיח על הנבדל מהם. אחרי אשר נתבלבלו בלשונם. ולא ידעו אחד דברי רעהו אבל עדיין היה אפשר להסכים ברצון אחד לשבת יחד מש״ה הודיע הכתוב שממילא נפרדו לגמרי: (א) ומשם הפיצם ה׳ וגו׳. גם זה טעם על שם בבל. דאלו משום שבלל ה׳ שפתם היה ראוי להקרא בלל. אבל בבל הוא משני שרשים מלשון בלל. וחסר למ״ד הפעל. ומלשון יבל. וחסר פ״א הפעל מש״ה בא השם בשני ביתי״ן וע׳ מש״כ לעיל על שם נח:

(1) ...One language - that is what caused the first sin. This is that they agreed to stop in one single place. And this is against the will of God that said to "fill the land and replenish it" - that is, to walk to all its places, since the land was created to be settled.

(2) ...And the same words - The text did not explain what those words were, rather, it leaves as a hint, as explained in midrashim. But the words themselves are not explained by the text, it just tells us that they were the same words, to teach us that it wasn't because of the content of the words themselves that the Holy One of Blessing was distressed. They were what they were, and in its simplicity there is not sin, and on the contrary all appears well. But here what happened is that all thought the same thing, and this came to be the problem of the settlement.

(1) Burn them thoroughly - There is no place in the Text where something is told that has no impact in the story [therefore, ask:] Why do I care if they were using stones; bricks; were constructing using wood; or made their brick by burning? Even before the Flood it is written "and afterward he build a city" (Genesis 4:17)! And it appears that here there is a hint regarding our sages' tradition that Avraham Avinu was thrown in the fiery furnace - ... But from here we have a hint to the issue of what obviously was happening before the tradition saying that they threw Avraham Avinu into the fiery furnace: they did not make the furnace for this need [to burn people], rather this was the fiery furnace (in Daniel, see Dan. 3:6) done for the need of people [to fire bricks]. And the Text is informing that this furnace was for the need of the city and the tower, and from this we understand how big and deep was this furnace, and from this furnace Avraham Avinu was saved.

(1) And its top in the sky - It is obvious that you should not think that this would be one city to the whole world, rather they thought that the other nearby cities would be subjects to that city that had the tower, that they would be able to see from it to the distance, over all their settlement, so that no one would be able to separate themselves and go to another land. That's why they needed its top reaching the sky.

(2) And we will make a name for ourselves - people were set up to watch אנשים משגיחים and be in charge of the thing, and they were army chiefs in charge of punishing those who would cross, since if this is not the case there would be no need for the tower. And all that was due to fear/suspicion.

(3) Lest we be scattered over all the face of the earth - However, we must understand why they feared that someone might leave to another land. And it is understood that this was related to the uniformity that was among them. And since the opinions of people are not identical, they feared that people might abandon this philosophy and adopt another. Therefore they sought to ensure that no one would leave their society. And one who veered from this uniformity among them was judged with burning, just as they did to our forefather Abraham. And the "same words" can also be seen as the fact that they would kill whoever did not think like them. And more is explained on verse 6. (1) They are one people. The explanation of "people" is that they all follow one custom [minhag], as it is written later on Gen. 28:3 in the explanation of 'and you shall be a congregation of peoples'. (2) If this they began to do. This is but the beginning of the transgression: they want to remain in one place. (3) And now nothing will be withholden from them which they purpose to do. If they finish the tower they will come to a second thought, to prevent by force other thoughts than this one. And this is a thing [that brings] killing, and violent destruction of the settlement, and it does not help that at this moment they are together with one opinion.

והיית לקהל עמים. קהל הוא עשרה. כדאי׳ בכתובות ד״ז ב׳. ועמים הוא שניכרים בשנוי הליכתם לעם בפ״ע אע״ג שהמה בממשלה אחת ... ואמר לו שיהיה זרע יעקב עשרה עמים. היינו דכל שבט יהיה למנהג ועם בפ״ע אע״ג שהי׳ להם תורה אחת ומלך אחד מ״מ היו משונים בהליכות עולם....

“And you shall become an assembly of peoples” (Genesis 28:3)

An assembly (kahal) consists of ten, as stated in Ketubot 7b. The word peoples (amim) refers to groups distinguishable from one another by their different ways of life, so that each is considered a people unto itself—even though they are all governed by a single authority. ....

God therefore told Jacob that his descendants would become ten peoples. That is, each tribe would possess its own customs and constitute a people unto itself. Although they would all share one Torah and one king, they would nevertheless differ in their ways of conducting worldly life.

...

(א) זה הספר הנקרא ספר בראשית. נקרא בפי הנביאים ספר הישר ...

(ג) והענין דנתבאר בשירת האזינו עה״פ הצור תמים פעלו וגו' צדיק וישר הוא. דשבח ישר הוא נאמר להצדיק דין הקב״ה בחרבן בית שני שהיה דור עקש ופתלתל. ופירשנו שהיו צדיקים וחסידים ועמלי תורה. אך לא היו ישרים בהליכות עולמים. ע״כ מפני שנאת חנם שבלבם זא״ז חשדו את מי שראו שנוהג שלא כדעתם ביראת ה׳ שהוא צדוקי ואפיקורס. ובאו עי״ז לידי ש״ד בדרך הפלגה ולכל הרעות שבעולם עד שחרב הבית. וע״ז היה צדוק הדין. שהקב״ה ישר הוא ואינו סובל צדיקים כאלו אלא באופן שהולכים בדרך הישר גם בהליכות עולם ולא בעקמימות אע״ג שהוא לש״ש דזה גורם חרבן הבריאה והריסות ישוב הארץ.

(ד) וזה היה שבח האבות שמלבד שהיו צדיקים וחסידים ואוהבי ה׳ באופן היותר אפשר. עוד היו ישרים. היינו שהתנהגו עם אוה״ע אפי׳ עובדי אלילים מכוערים. מ״מ היו עמם באהבה וחשו לטובתם באשר היא קיום הבריאה. כמו שאנו רואים כמה השתטח א״א להתפלל על סדום. אע״ג שהיה שנא אותם ואת מלכם תכלית שנאה עבור רשעתם כמבואר במאמרו למלך סדום. מ״מ חפץ בקיומם. וברבה פ׳ וירא (פמ״ט) איתא ע״ז שאמר הקב״ה לא״א אהבת צדק ותשנא רשע. אהבת להצדיק את בריותי ותשנא להרשיען ע״כ וכו'. והיינו ממש כאב המון גוים שאע״ג שאין הבן הולך במישרים מ״מ שוחר שלומו וטובו....

(ו) ובדברנו נתיישב יפה על מה נקרא זה הספר ספר הישר שהוא ספר הבריאה:

(1) This Book commonly known as The Book of Bereishis, is referred to by the Prophets as Sefer HaYashar, the Book of the Upright, ...

(3) [The meaning of] yashar is as described in the Song of Ha’azenu:
The Rock - perfect is His work, for all His paths are justice; a faithful God without injustice - righteous and yashar is He.
By praising [God as] yashar, [the Torah] acknowledges the Holy One blessed be He’s judgment to be weighed against a generation [such as those who would] live during the destruction of the Second Temple, who are described as a perverse and twisted generation. We explained [ad loc], though they were righteous and pious, toiling in Torah study, they were not upright in their societal behavior. And so due to the baseless hatred for one another residing within their hearts, they suspected anyone who was not religious in accordance with their viewpoint to be a Sadducee or heretic. [This deficiency in the Torah scholars’ character] led to rampant murder along with a transgression of all the other evils in the world, causing the Temple’s destruction. [This is how the Torah presents] the acknowledgment of God’s justice [here]: the Holy One blessed be He is yashar, being intolerant of those types of [distorted] righteous individuals. [He is only accepting] of those who act in a way that is socially yashar – unlike those who act in a perverse manner, even when their actions are performed for the sake of Heaven. As such [a deficiency] can lead to the destruction of [God’s] creation and the ruin of civilization. (4) This was the greatness of our forefathers. In addition to being righteous, pious, and lovers of God to the utmost degree, they were also yesharim. That means they were civil with the [other] nations of the world, despite [the latter] being detestable idol worshipers. Our forefathers nevertheless extended them love and concern for their welfare, as this fortifies [God’s] creation.
[To illustrate,] we see how our forefather Avraham exerted himself greatly in prayer for the welfare of Sodom. He desired their survival, even though he totally detested them and their king due to their evil ways (as is clear from how he spoke to the King of Sodom). In the Midrash Rabbah on Parashas Vayerah, (Parasha 49) we find the following about this:
The Holy One Blessed Be He said to our forefather Avraham, “You love righteousness and loathe wickedness. You love to vindicate My creations and you loathe to convict them.”
He literally was like the father of a multitude of nations. For even when one’s son is not walking in righteousness, [the father still] seeks out his wellbeing and benefit. Similarly did graciousness and the most remarkable civility abound within Avraham’s words to Lot, as will become clear in the parashah of Lech L’cha....

This behavior is that which sustains the world, which is in turn a theme particular to this Book, the Book of Creation. For this reason this book is also entitled Sefer Ha-Yashar, highlighting this aspect of our forefathers’ actions. (5) ... (6) We have explained well why this book is entitled, Sefer HaYashar, being the Book of Creation.

The bridge to the Pope - Rabbi Sacks:
"Genesis 11, the story of the Tower of Babel, is a story rooted in the fact that the one language is not some utopian harmony and some golden age. It is in fact what the 19th century Jewish commentator, the Netziv (Naftali Zvi Yehuda Berlin), intuited, when he said that Babel is the first totalitarianism. This is not an ideal harmony, it is an imposed uniformity. Babel is cosmopolis." see transcript: After Babel: A Jewish theology of interfaith [In February 2012, the Chief Rabbi was the Visiting Professor in Interfaith Studies at Oxford University. As part of this Humanitas Programme, the Chief Rabbi delivered a series of evening lectures on the subject of ‘Making Space: A Jewish Theology of the Other’. This first Lecture was titled, 'After Babel'.]
The Wall Street Journal reported on May 25th, 2026:
Pope Leo Compares AI Threat to Biblical ‘Tower of Babel’
VATICAN CITY—Pope Leo XIV warned that artificial intelligence “threatens to normalize an anti-human vision” and said that the concentration of immense digital power in the hands of a few private actors must be countered.
The pontiff’s encyclical letter—a text that is poised to define Leo’s papacy—reads like a sharp warning to Silicon Valley executives and humanity more broadly about the future of civilization as new technologies rapidly advance.
The risk, he said, is that humans will be reduced “to mere cogs in a system driven toward ever greater efficiency.”
Leo used two biblical images to describe the choice humanity faces.
“The primary choice is not between a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ to technology, but rather between constructing Babel or rebuilding Jerusalem,” he wrote.
In the Bible, the Tower of Babel symbolizes a top-down, grandiose project where decisions are driven by pride, profit and a push for homogenization, the pope suggested in his text. In the rebuilding of Jerusalem, diverse people worked together to rebuild the ruined walls and established a fraternal coexistence within them, he added.
The full text of the Encyclical Letter:
ENCYCLICAL LETTER, MAGNIFICA HUMANITAS' OF HIS HOLINESS' POPE LEO XIV
ON SAFEGUARDING THE HUMAN PERSON IN THE TIME OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE is here.
1. Humanity, created by God in all its grandeur, is today facing a pivotal choice: either to construct a new Tower of Babel or to build the city in which God and humanity dwell together. Each generation inherits the task of shaping its own era, of guiding history to become a place where the dignity of every person is safeguarded, justice is promoted and fraternity is made possible. Yet every era also runs the risk of creating an inhumane and more unjust world...
4. .... Over the centuries, technological development has significantly improved the living conditions of humanity. At the same time, each phase of progress has also revealed the ambiguity of tools that can cause harm when not oriented toward the good. Today, however, we find ourselves facing a new situation. The power and prevalence of emerging technologies are interwoven into the fabric of daily life, shaping decision-making processes and deeply affecting the collective imagination: “Never has humanity had such power over itself.” New technologies open up a horizon extending in directions that are imaginable but not yet fully predictable. This complicates the assessment of their potential impact and the long-term effects they may have on both the dignity of individuals and the common good.
6. .... most people are watching and waiting, observing from afar and merely hoping for the best. For this very reason, crucial questions impose themselves on our conscience and can no longer be avoided: Where are we going? Toward what goal do we wish to orient ourselves? What direction should we choose as a people and as a human community?
Two biblical images
7. In order to answer these questions and discern how to navigate responsibly the era of AI, I would like to bring to mind two scenes from the Bible: the construction of the Tower of Babel (cf. Gen 11:1-9) and the rebuilding of the walls of Jerusalem (cf. Neh 2–6). The story of Babel appears in the Book of Genesis, at the origins of humanity, immediately after the genealogies of Noah’s sons. After settling in a plain in the land of Shinar, the people decided to build a city and a tower “with its top in the heavens” (Gen 11:4). Fearing being scattered across the earth, they sought to guarantee stability and power for themselves, and above all to “make a name” for themselves. It was an impressive feat: a single language, a single technology, a single direction. However, the project concealed a profound danger. It was a project conceived without reference to God, supported by a uniformity that eliminated diversity and that chose homogenization over communion. When a city is built on pride and the claim to self-sufficiency, communication breaks down, languages are confused and people no longer understand each other. The result is not unity, but dispersion. Babel thus reveals the limits of any effort that, however grandiose, arises from self-affirmation, sacrifices human dignity for efficiency and aspires to reach heaven without God’s blessing.
8. The Book of Nehemiah, in turn, opens at a time of great vulnerability in the history of ancient Israel. After the Babylonian exile, a portion of the people returned to Jerusalem, but the city was still in ruins, the walls collapsed and the gates burned (cf. Neh 1–2). Nehemiah, a Jew in the service of the Persian King Artaxerxes, received news of the disastrous state of his ancestral city. Before taking action, he fasted, prayed and interceded for the people. He then asked the king for permission to return to Jerusalem and, upon arriving, examined the destroyed areas in silence. He did not impose solutions from above. He convened the families, assigned each of them a section of the wall to rebuild, listened to their concerns, coordinated their efforts and addressed any opposition. The narrative shows how the city is reborn, not through the initiative of one man, but through the shared responsibility of all: men, women, priests, artisans, heads of households and young people all play a part. It is an undertaking with God at the center, which rebuilds relationships before rebuilding with stones. Thus, ancient Jerusalem rediscovers a common language — not one of uniformity, but one of communion, namely the harmony that arises when all persons assume their own role and recognize that their strength comes from the Lord.
9. ... In the abstract, technology in and of itself is not a solution to humanity’s problems, just as it is not inherently evil. In practice, however, technology is never neutral, because it takes on the characteristics of those who devise, finance, regulate and use it. Therefore, the primary choice is not between a “yes” or “no” to technology, but rather between constructing Babel or rebuilding Jerusalem; between a power that claims to dominate the heavens and a people who work together in the presence of God to rebuild the walls of fraternal coexistence.
10. We must, then, avoid the “Babel syndrome,” namely the idolatry of profit that sacrifices the weak, a uniformity that neutralizes differences, and the pretense that a single language — even a digital one — can translate everything, including the mystery of the person, into data and performance. The risk of dehumanization — of building a future that excludes God and reduces the other to a means — is an ancient and ever-new temptation that today takes on a technical guise. Instead, let us choose the “way of Nehemiah,” which highlights the importance of working together to make the City of God a safe place for returning exiles. Rebuilding today means recognizing that, precisely from the plurality of voices and visions which, even though they sometimes remind us of the confusion caused by the diversity of spoken languages, a bright possibility emerges. Indeed, this is the possibility of building together, of transforming diversity into a resource and of making listening and dialogue the common ground upon which to cultivate justice and fraternity....
16. I address this heartfelt appeal to all the Catholic faithful, to all Christians and to all men and women of goodwill.
Let us not be afraid to get our hands dirty on the “construction site” of our time. Like Nehemiah, let us pray, plan wisely and work perseveringly, placing God at the forefront of our actions and the human person at the center of our choices. Thus, the “rejected stones” — the poor, the sick, the migrants and the least among us — will become the cornerstone, and a solid, welcoming common home will emerge on the earth, where love and faithfulness will finally meet, and righteousness and peace will embrace (cf. Ps 85:10). This is the blessing we implore from God; and the task that stands before us is that of being builders of communion, rather than architects of Babel.'
241. As we look to the future, I would like to recall the image of Nehemiah whom we chose as our companion and guide at the outset. Nehemiah heard the cry of a devastated city, brought that pain to prayer, discerned before God, asked for help, received permission to return, organized the work, confronted internal and external resistance and rebuilt the walls of Jerusalem with the assistance of the people, brick by brick. In this era of digital transformation, I see in him a striking parable of our own vocation, which is not to be passive spectators of social and cultural fractures, nor mere commentators on what is crumbling, but men and women prepared to enter the construction sites of history — research laboratories, technology companies, schools, the media, institutions and local communities — in order to rebuild what has collapsed and protect what is threatened. Like Nehemiah, we too are called to unite listening and courage, prayer and responsibility, so that, even when a technocratic mentality or partisan interests seem to prevail, the human city may become a more fitting place to live.
The Netziv never explicitly sets Nehemiah against Babel. But in his Zionist correspondence he does something remarkably close: he invokes the return under Ezra and Nehemiah as a model in which profoundly different—and sometimes deeply compromised—Jews first unite to rebuild, and only then wrestle over the religious character of what they have built.
First letter: the mixed company returning with Ezra
This was originally entered in the register of the Volozhin branch of Ḥovevei Zion in Kislev 5646—late 1885, although it is often described generally as an 1886 letter.
The Netziv calls supporting settlement a mitzvah and an obligation and insists that the undertaking involve:
בכל סוגי בני ישראל
“Every kind and class of Jew.”
He then supplies the biblical precedent:
וכמו שהיה בימי עזרא הסופר שקבץ איזה אלפים בבבל מכל סוגי בני אדם; גדולי תורה ויראי ה׳ וגם מאותם האנשים נושאי נשים נכריות; אשר היו מורגלים בחלול שבת ולא ידעו את התורה כלל; כל אלה נתקבצו והכינו ישוב הארץ בערים עד שאח״כ נתמלאה הארץ מבניה.
“Just as it was in the days of Ezra the Scribe, who gathered several thousand people in Babylonia from every kind of human being: great Torah scholars and those who feared God, but also people married to foreign women, who were accustomed to desecrating the Sabbath and knew no Torah at all. All of these were gathered together and prepared the settlement of the Land in its cities, until afterward the Land became filled with its children.”
The Second letter: unity made from differing opinions
The second letter is his reply to the leaders of Ḥovevei Zion in Warsaw after the first statement attracted wider attention. Here he makes an extraordinary declaration:
הסגולה השניה היא ההתאחדות של הרבה דעות שונות למרכז אחד... הן במקומות מפוזרים, הן בדעות ששונות בהליכות עולם של ישראל.
“The second precious quality is the uniting of many different opinions around one common center—a focus toward which all the dispersed of God’s people may turn: dispersed both geographically and in opinions that differ regarding the conduct of Jewish life.”
He continues
וזכינו שזה הענין של ישוב הארץ הוא הבריח התיכון, המבריח את ישראל מקצה העולם ועד קצהו, לדעת אחת בזה הענין. ובשעה שכל ישראל נאחדים נקראו כולם חברים.
“We have merited that this matter of settling the Land has become the central bar extending through Israel from one end of the world to the other, uniting them in one shared understanding regarding this matter. And when all Israel are united, they are all called ḥaverim.”